The value of -1 is the default value used by the underlying http
transports provided by the jre. On some versions an attempt to
set the timeout explicitly to -1 triggers a check condition,
disallowing negative numbers.
Bug: 389003
Change-Id: I74a22f8edc6c8e15843ad07c96a137739d9dcad1
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This makes it display nicely on the GitHub mirror repository. And it is
still very pleasant to read in plain text.
Change-Id: I0c5e1caa58a22684cdbd9a02e9ec38e97d5adb1a
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
None of these should have been exposed to base classes. The majority
of them are private implementation details that are not required by a
subclass in order to interact with the base protocol definition. The
few that are needed should be visible as accessor methods, so the
internals can be modified without breaking the public JGit API.
Change-Id: I874179105c9c37703307facbbf99387c52bf772c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This flag was added to provide an unsafe operation on the local
repository because the storage.dht code was too damn slow to provide
proper safe Git behavior all of the time. Now that stoarge.dht has
been removed from the repository, also delete this unsafe flag to
prevent applications from misusing the JGit library and permitting
users to potentially damage their local repository with bad data
received from an untrusted peer.
Change-Id: Ib1861c48bb74836731e7b7d57b635dd654b0dc66
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This experiment proved to be not very useful. I had originally
planned to use this on top of Google Bigtable, Apache HBase or
Apache Cassandra. Unfortunately the schema is very complex and
does not perform well. The storage.dfs package has much better
performance and has been in production at Google for many months
now, proving it is a viable storage backend for Git.
As there are no users of the storage.dht schema, either at Google or
any other company, nor any valid open source implementations of the
storage system, drop the entire package and API from the JGit project.
There is no point in trying to maintain code that is simply not used.
Change-Id: Ia8d32f27426d2bcc12e7dc9cc4524c59f4fe4df9
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Change-Id: Id3ab5f56f88d7e9636c71b30258c268a75fc422e
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When a file is not in the index and neither contents nor mode differ
between "head" and "merge", the index state should be kept. If they
differ, a checkout conflict should occur. This is described in Git's
git-read-tree.txt.
JGit used to replace the index state with "merge" in both of the above
cases.
A confusing effect of this was that when one removed a file and then did
a rebase, the file silently reappeared again.
The changes to dir/file conflict handling are a consequence of this
change, as the index handling change made tests in DirCacheCheckoutTest
break. I compared these cases to C Git and the new behavior there also
matches what C Git does.
Bug: 387390
Change-Id: I5beb781f12172a68f98c67d4c8029eb51ceae62d
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
The transformation is the same as AutoCRLFOutputStream does, but
the direction is reversed. The tests are reused, but the implementation
derives somewhat from the EolCanonicalizingInputStream.
This stream will be used to compare blobs with LF line endings with
worktree data that has CRLF line endings.
Bug: 387501
Change-Id: I80d96e453e7f780dd464a89778de124cf35384e1
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The statistics for a repo now expose how many bytes are used in the
filesystem to store all loose/packed objects. The number of packed/loose
refs are also exposed.
Change-Id: I335a4c7630a2629a86f13a2a5cd99f79a2c2afa4
In order to parse user specified strings containing date and time info
a thread-safe parser is implemented. This is needed for example to
interpret configuration parameters (e.g. gc.pruneexpire where need to
parse strings like "2 weeks ago"). The parser is thread-safe by caching
SimpleDateFormat instances in a ThreadLocal cache.
Native git has a parser called approxidate which is able to interpret a
huge number of formats ("1 year ago", "tea time", ...). Ideally JGit
should be able to parse the same strings as native git but for now this
parser understands the following subset:
"now"
"yesterday"
"(x) years|months|weeks|days|hours|minutes|seconds ago"
"yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss Z" (ISO)
"EEE, dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss Z" (RFC)
"yyyy-MM-dd"
"yyyy.MM.dd"
"MM/dd/yyyy"
"dd.MM.yyyy"
"EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss yyyy Z" (DEFAULT)
"EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss yyyy" (LOCAL)
Change-Id: Iccb66dadb60da13104e73140e53d5e2de068369c
The Jetty 7.x p2 repository was moved to the archive server
Change-Id: If864c64e8a64ced9b9b982332b412b367a6c1011
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
EGit should be able to continue a rebase started by C Git.
Change-Id: I63058026295fec34157b5687ae87ae9cb0c27c86
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Java has no option but to use precomposed Unicode, so we should
state that when creating a new repository. Not that Java will use
precomposed unicode regardless of this setting, but this reduces
the risk of incompatibility with C Git.
Change-Id: I3779b75f76d2e2061c836cbc9b4b7c2ae0cf18f4
* changes:
Support [<ref>]@{upstream} revision syntax
Support parsing previous checkout as a revision expresion.
Allow a @ without branch in revision syntax
JGit was not able to lookup refs which had the name of files which exist
in the .git folder. When JGit was looking up a ref named X it has a
fixed set of directories where it searched for files named X
(ignore packed refs for now). First directory to search for is .git. In
case of the ref named 'config' it searched there for this file, found it
(it's the .git/config file with the repo configuration in it), parsed
it, found it is an invalid ref and stopped searching. It never looked
for a file .git/refs/heads/config.
I changed JGit in a way that when it finds a file in GIT_DIR which
corresponds to a ref name and if this file doesn't contain a valid ref
then it will ignore the InvalidObjectIdException and continue searching.
Change-Id: Ic26a329fb1624a5b2b2494c78bac4bd76817c100
Bug: 381574
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
The method uses some heuristics to obtain much better performance
than isMergeBase.
Since I wrote the relevant code in the method I approve the license
change from EPL to EDL implied by the move.
Change-Id: Ic4a7584811a2b0bf24e4f6b3eab2a7c022eabee8
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
EGit wasn't able to decorate local branches tracking another local
branch with number of commits the checked out local branch differs from
the other local branch it's tracking.
Bug: 376970
Change-Id: I74e932d5eacd74dbf6b0dffcfc65ba3222a8250e
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
On conflicts in rebase or cherry-pick, the conflict markers were like
this:
<<<<<<< OURS
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> THEIRS
This is technically correct, but it could be better.
It's especially confusing during a rebase, where the meaning of
OURS/THEIRS is not obvious. The intuition is that "ours" is the commits
that "I" did before the rebase, but it's the other way around because of
the way rebase works. See various bug reports and stackoverflow
discussions.
With this change, in the case of a cherry-pick while on master, the
markers will be like this:
<<<<<<< master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> bad1dea Message of the commit I'm cherry-picking
In the case of a "git rebase master":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
It's not "master" because that would only be correct for the first
cherry-pick during a rebase, after that, it's master + already
cherry-picked commits.
And in the case of a "git pull --rebase":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on branch 'master' of git@example.org:repo
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
Bug: 336819
Change-Id: I1333a8dd170bb0077f491962013485efb6f2a926
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
In DFS, everything is stored in a pack but only objects in a pack with
source GC or UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE have had delta compression attempted.
Expose the PackSource setter and getter on DfsPackDescription in order
to implement wasDeltaAttempted.
Change-Id: Ie949f321147ad870f1c3f23b552343bbbda32152
If an object is in a pack file already, delta compression will not
attempt to re-compress it. This assumes that the previous
packing already performed the optimal compression attempt, however,
the subclasses of StoredObjectRepresentation may use other heuristics
to determine if the stored format is optimal.
Change-Id: I403de522f4b0dd2667d54f6faed621f392c07786
This change makes CheckoutCommand pass the list of modified files
through the OK result, enabling outside world to react in a smaller
scope (for example refresh only resources containing the modified
files).
Change-Id: I53c50ee09bc0d3ff501bdc25196e52e739c3f1f9
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
Change-Id: I03f59d07bcc3338ef8d392cbd940799186ca03bd
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Since git doesn't keep track of empty directories, they should be
created first. Test case included demonstrates that using
StashApplyCommand(). Bugfix is applied to the DirCacheCheckout class,
because StashApplyCommand() uses it internally to apply a stash.
Change-Id: Iac259229ef919f9e92e7e51a671d877172bb88a8
Signed-off-by: Jevgeni Zelenkov <jevgeni.zelenkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
JGit allows to create commits which have duplicate parents: e.g. a
commit X has first parent Y and second parent Y. Such commits are not
handled correctly by PlotCommit leading to wrong display of the history
in EGit. In such cases there is a never ending passing line drawn beside
all commits younger than the commit with duplicate parents. This commit
fixes this by explicitly checking for duplicate parents.
In a different commit we should fix JGit not to create commits with
duplicate parents. I think native git also doesn't allow such commits,
although history display in native git (gitk, git log --graph) is not
damaged by such commits.
Change-Id: Ie3019ef613a507023958bea27b1badc3b8950279