The git-lfs specification [1] describes the following optional status codes
that may be returned:
429 - The user has hit a rate limit with the server. Though the API does
not specify any rate limits, implementors are encouraged to set some
for availability reasons.
509 - Returned if the bandwidth limit for the user or repository has been
exceeded. The API does not specify any bandwidth limit, but implementors
may track usage.
Add two new exception classes to represent these cases. Implementations may
throw these from #getLargeFileRepository(), causing the corresponding HTTP
status codes to be returned to the client.
[1] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/v1/http-v1-batch.md
Change-Id: I7b93f3cf90f7344c90b1587e07927fdeb167097e
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
If the message is not sent, the client shows:
Unable to parse HTTP response for POST http://admin@localhost:8080/test-project/info/lfs/objects/batch
Change-Id: I8b72d1aded2bcd41b7389676e2373034625a1379
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Instead of hard-coding the message strings, define them in a properties
file. This will allow them to be translated.
Change-Id: I77556881579e66b2c13d187759c7efdddfee87ae
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Instead of using hard-coded HTTP status codes, use the enums
which makes it a bit easier to see what's expected.
Change-Id: I2da5d25632f374b8625d64da4df70d1c9c406bb1
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
AddCommandTest is flaky because IOException is thrown sometimes.
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.lang.ProcessBuilder$NullOutputStream.write(ProcessBuilder.java:433)
at java.io.OutputStream.write(OutputStream.java:116)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:82)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:140)
at java.io.FilterOutputStream.close(FilterOutputStream.java:158)
at org.eclipse.jgit.util.FS.runProcess(FS.java:993)
at org.eclipse.jgit.util.FS.execute(FS.java:1102)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.WorkingTreeIterator.filterClean(WorkingTreeIterator.java:470)
... 22 more
OpenJDK replaces the underlying OutputStream with NullOutputStream when
the process exits. This throws IOException for all write operation. When
it exits before JGit writes the input to the pipe buffer, the input
stays in BufferedOutputStream. The close method tries to write it again,
and IOException is thrown.
Since we ignore IOException in StreamGobbler, we also ignore it when
we close the stream.
Fixes Bug 499633.
Change-Id: I30c7ac78e05b00bd0152f697848f4d17d53efd17
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <draftcode@gmail.com>
If a reference was updated more recently than a pack was written
(typical) the PackList was perpetually dirty until the next GC
was completed for the repository.
Detect this condition by observing no changes to the PackList
membership and resetting the dirty bit.
Change-Id: Ie2133aca1f8083307c73b6a26358175864f100ef
This will be used by EGit for implementing commit amend in the staging
view (see Idcd1efeeee8b3065bae36e285bfc0af24ab1e88f).
Change-Id: Ice9ebbb1c0c3314c679f4db40cdd3664f61c27c3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
If the Content-Type is not set on error responses, the git-lfs client
does not read the body which contains the error message, and instead
just displays a generic error message.
Also set the charset on the Content-Type header.
Change-Id: I88e6f07f20b622a670e7c5063145dffb8b630aee
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Pretty printing is only used for outputting json content, which is
interpreted by the client and does not need to be pretty printed.
Change-Id: I48e0280241b6b0f5706300ae0f4c9bc461a89110
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Trying to open a new writer on the response causes an illegal state
exception and the response is not sent.
Change-Id: Ic718d23cfb3e74f5691cc2aea7283003af7df207
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Reported-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I9e9b021d335bda4d58b6bcc30f59b81ac5b37724
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
bb9988c2 changed the signature of getLargeFileRepository() which is only
breaking implementors which is ok according to OSGi semantic versioning
rules.
Change-Id: I68bda7900b72e217571f74aee53705167f8100a2
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
* changes:
Shallow fetch: Pass along "shallow"s in unparsed-wants case, too
Shallow fetch: Pass a DepthWalk to PackWriter
Change-Id: I7d1c3b4d0b7ebc254b53404d1618522b0174ac23
Since 84d2738ff2 (Don't skip want validation when the client sends no
haves, 2013-06-21), this branch is not taken. Process the
"shallow"s anyway as a defensive measure in case the code path gets
revived.
Change-Id: Idfb834825d77f51e17191c1635c9d78c78738cfd
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
d385a7a5e5 (Shallow fetch: Respect "shallow" lines, 2016-08-03) forgot
that UploadPack wasn't passing a DepthWalk to PackWriter in the first
place. As a result, shallow clones fail:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Shallow packs require a DepthWalk
at org.eclipse.jgit.internal.storage.pack.PackWriter.preparePack(PackWriter.java:756)
at org.eclipse.jgit.transport.UploadPack.sendPack(UploadPack.java:1497)
at org.eclipse.jgit.transport.UploadPack.sendPack(UploadPack.java:1381)
at org.eclipse.jgit.transport.UploadPack.service(UploadPack.java:774)
at org.eclipse.jgit.transport.UploadPack.upload(UploadPack.java:667)
at org.eclipse.jgit.http.server.UploadPackServlet.doPost(UploadPackServlet.java:191)
Change-Id: Ib0d8c2946eebfea910a2b767fb92e23da15d4749
This fixes the warning "src/ is missing from source.."
Change-Id: I166e3a6a3d5230e4110d3283ec4dbc7d1dfe6732
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
* changes:
LfsProtocolServlet: Allow access to objects in request
LfsProtocolServlet: Allow getLargeFileRepository to raise exceptions
Remove references to org.eclipse.jgit.java7
cgit changed the --depth parameter to mean the total depth of history
rather than the depth of ancestors to be returned [1]. JGit still uses
the latter meaning, so update it to match cgit.
depth=0 still means a non-shallow clone. depth=1 now means only the
wants rather than the wants and their direct parents.
This is accomplished by changing the semantic meaning of "depth" in
UploadPack and PackWriter to mean the total depth of history desired,
while keeping "depth" in DepthWalk.{RevWalk,ObjectWalk} to mean
the depth of traversal. Thus UploadPack and PackWriter always
initialize their DepthWalks with "depth-1".
[1] upload-pack: fix off-by-one depth calculation in shallow clone
https://code.googlesource.com/git/+/682c7d2f1a2d1a5443777237450505738af2ff1a
Change-Id: I87ed3c0f56c37e3491e367a41f5e555c4207ff44
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
When fetching from a shallow clone, the client sends "have" lines
to tell the server about objects it already has and "shallow" lines
to tell where its local history terminates. In some circumstances,
the server fails to honor the shallow lines and fails to return
objects that the client needs.
UploadPack passes the "have" lines to PackWriter so PackWriter can
omit them from the generated pack. UploadPack processes "shallow"
lines by calling RevWalk.assumeShallow() with the set of shallow
commits. RevWalk creates and caches RevCommits for these shallow
commits, clearing out their parents. That way, walks correctly
terminate at the shallow commits instead of assuming the client has
history going back behind them. UploadPack converts its RevWalk to an
ObjectWalk, maintaining the cached RevCommits, and passes it to
PackWriter.
Unfortunately, to support shallow fetches the PackWriter does the
following:
if (shallowPack && !(walk instanceof DepthWalk.ObjectWalk))
walk = new DepthWalk.ObjectWalk(reader, depth);
That is, when the client sends a "deepen" line (fetch --depth=<n>)
and the caller has not passed in a DepthWalk.ObjectWalk, PackWriter
throws away the RevWalk that was passed in and makes a new one. The
cleared parent lists prepared by RevWalk.assumeShallow() are lost.
Fortunately UploadPack intends to pass in a DepthWalk.ObjectWalk.
It tries to create it by calling toObjectWalkWithSameObjects() on
a DepthWalk.RevWalk. But it doesn't work: because DepthWalk.RevWalk
does not override the standard RevWalk#toObjectWalkWithSameObjects
implementation, the result is a plain ObjectWalk instead of an
instance of DepthWalk.ObjectWalk.
The result is that the "shallow" information is thrown away and
objects reachable from the shallow commits can be omitted from the
pack sent when fetching with --depth from a shallow clone.
Multiple factors collude to limit the circumstances under which this
bug can be observed:
1. Commits with depth != 0 don't enter DepthGenerator's pending queue.
That means a "have" cannot have any effect on DepthGenerator unless
it is also a "want".
2. DepthGenerator#next() doesn't call carryFlagsImpl(), so the
uninteresting flag is not propagated to ancestors there even if a
"have" is also a "want".
3. JGit treats a depth of 1 as "1 past the wants".
Because of (2), the only place the UNINTERESTING flag can leak to a
shallow commit's parents is in the carryFlags() call from
markUninteresting(). carryFlags() only traverses commits that have
already been parsed: commits yet to be parsed are supposed to inherit
correct flags from their parent in PendingGenerator#next (which
doesn't happen here --- that is (2)). So the list of commits that have
already been parsed becomes relevant.
When we hit the markUninteresting() call, all "want"s, "have"s, and
commits to be unshallowed have been parsed. carryFlags() only
affects the parsed commits. If the "want" is a direct parent of a
"have", then it carryFlags() marks it as uninteresting. If the "have"
was also a "shallow", then its parent pointer should have been null
and the "want" shouldn't have been marked, so we see the bug. If the
"want" is a more distant ancestor then (2) keeps the uninteresting
state from propagating to the "want" and we don't see the bug. If the
"shallow" is not also a "have" then the shallow commit isn't parsed
so (2) keeps the uninteresting state from propagating to the "want
so we don't see the bug.
Here is a reproduction case (time flowing left to right, arrows
pointing to parents). "C" must be a commit that the client
reports as a "have" during negotiation. That can only happen if the
server reports it as an existing branch or tag in the first round of
negotiation:
A <-- B <-- C <-- D
First do
git clone --depth 1 <repo>
which yields D as a "have" and C as a "shallow" commit. Then try
git fetch --depth 1 <repo> B:refs/heads/B
Negotiation sets up: have D, shallow C, have C, want B.
But due to this bug B is marked as uninteresting and is not sent.
Change-Id: I6e14b57b2f85e52d28cdcf356df647870f475440
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Classes implementing the LFS servlet should be able to inspect the
objects given in the request.
Add a getObjects method. Make the LfsObject class public, and add
accessor methods.
Change-Id: I27961679f620eb3a89dc8521aadd4ea2f936c60e
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
According to the specification [1] the server may return the following
HTTP error responses:
- 403: The user has read, but not write access.
- 404: The repository does not exist for the user.
- 422: Validation error with one or more of the objects in the request.
In the current implementation, however, getLargeFileRepository can only
return null to indicate an error. This results in the error code:
- 503: Service Unavailable
being returned to the client regardless of what the actual reason was.
Add exception classes to cover these cases, derived from a common base
exception, and change the specification of getLargeFileRepository to throw
the base exception.
In LfsProtocolServlet#post, handle the new exceptions and send back the
appropriate HTTP responses as mentioned above.
The specification also mentions several other optional response codes (406,
429, 501, and 509) but these are not implemented in this commit. It should
be trivial to implement them in follow-up commits.
[1] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/v1/http-v1-batch.md#response-errors
Change-Id: I91be6165bcaf856d0cefc533882330962e2fc9b2
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The bundle org.eclipse.jgit.java7 was removed in 4.0.
Remove references to it from the README.md.
Remove reference to it from org.eclipse.jgit.test/.project, which
causes an error message when opening the project in Eclipse:
Resource '/org.eclipse.jgit.java7' does not exist.
Change-Id: If0dbd562dcd60550bec3c0f793289474b7624bce
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
DepthWalk needs to override toObjectWalkWithSameObjects() and thus
needs to be able to directly set the objects and freeFlags fields, so
make them package private.
Change-Id: I24561b82c54ba3d6522582ca25105b204d777074
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
When doing an incremental fetch from JGit, "have" commits are marked
as "uninteresting". In a non-shallow fetch, when the RevWalk hits an
"uninteresting" commit it marks the commit's corresponding tree as
uninteresting. That has the effect of dropping those trees and all the
trees and blobs they reference out of the thin pack returned to the
client.
However, shallow fetches use a DepthWalk to limit the RevWalk, which
nearly always causes the RevWalk to terminate before encountering the
"have" commits. As a result the pack created for the incremental fetch
never encounters "uninteresting" tree objects and thus includes
duplicate objects that it knows the client already has.
Change-Id: I7b1f7c3b0d83e04d34cd2fa676f1ad4fec904c05
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Previously jgit would attempt to clean git repositories that had not
been committed by calling a non-recursive delete on them, which would
fail as they are directories. This commit addresses that issue in the
following ways.
Repositories are skipped in a default clean, similarly to cgit and only
cleaned when the force flag is applied. When the force flag is applied
repositories are deleted using a recursive delete call. The force flag
and setForce method are added here to CleanCommand to support this
change.
Bug: 498367
Change-Id: Ib6cfff65a033d0d0f76395060bf76719e13fc467
Signed-off-by: Matthaus Owens <matthaus@puppetlabs.com>
This commit adds some test coverage to cleaning a repository with a
submodule, which did not previously exist.
Bug: 498367
Change-Id: Ia5c4e4cc53488800dd486f8556dc57656783f1c4
Signed-off-by: Matthaus Owens <matthaus@puppetlabs.com>
We have to be able to access the enum from outside the package as part of
the API.
Change-Id: I4bdc6bd53a14237c5f4fb9397ae850f9a24c4cfb
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Passing the request and path to the method will allow implementations
to have more control over determination of the backend, for example:
- return different backends for different requests
- accept or refuse requests based on request characteristics
- etc
Change-Id: I1ec6ec54c91a5f0601b620ed18846eb4a3f46783
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
David Pursehouse
Matthias Sohn
Shawn Pearce
Masaya Suzuki
Jonathan Nieder
Dan Wang
Jens Offenbach
Christian Halstrick
Terry Parker
Matthaus Owens
Dave Borowitz
Stefan Beller