Increase the safety factor to 2.5x for extra safety if max of measured
timestamp resolution and measured minimal racy threshold is < 100ms, use
1.25 otherwise since for large filesystem resolution values the
influence of finite resolution of the system clock should be negligible.
Before, not yet using the newly introduced minRacyThreshold measurement,
the threshold was 1.1x FS resolution, and we could issue the
following sequence of events,
start
create-file
read-file (currentTime)
end
which had the following timestamps:
create-file 1564589081998
start 1564589082002
read 1564589082003
end 1564589082004
In this case, the difference between create-file and read is 5ms,
which exceeded the 4ms FS resolution, even though the events together
took just 2ms of runtime.
Reproduce with:
bazel test --runs_per_test=100 \
//org.eclipse.jgit.test:org_eclipse_jgit_internal_storage_file_FileSnapshotTest
The file system timestamp resolution is 4ms in this case.
This code assumes that the kernel and the JVM use the same clock that
is synchronized with the file system clock. This seems plausible,
given the resolution of System.currentTimeMillis() and the latency for
a gettimeofday system call (typically ~1us), but it would be good to
justify this with specifications.
Also cover a source of flakiness: if the test runs under extreme load,
then we could have
start
create-file
<long delay>
read
end
which would register as an unmodified file. Avoid this by skipping the
test if end-start is too big.
[msohn]:
- downported from master to stable-5.1
- skip test if resolution is below 10ms
- adjust safety factor to 1.25 for resolutions above 100ms
Change-Id: I87d2cf035e01c44b7ba8364c410a860aa8e312ef
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Han-Wen Nienhuys
e60b9e1879