Implementation delegates all work to the AddCommand class and,
therefore, supports only those options currently supported by the
AddCommand which means: --update and the filepattern... arguments.
Change-Id: I4827d37e08b4c988c2458d9ba60a61b6ad414d10
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
The code analyzer can't know that passing a value known to be null is
not a problem. Hence better pass null explicitly instead of the
parameters being null.
Change-Id: I8db6f8014de6c00dd95974d60f61ecc66191e6d4
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
There was a bug in ResolveMerger which is one reason for
bug 328841. If a merge was failing because of conflicts
deletions where not handled correctly. Files which have
to be deleted (because there was a non-conflicting deletion
coming in from THEIRS) are not deleted. In the
non-conflicting case we also forgot to delete the file but
in this case we explicitly checkout in the end these files
get deleted during that checkout.
This is fixed by handling incoming deletions explicitly.
Bug: 328841
Change-Id: I7f4c94ab54138e1b2f3fcdf34fb803d68e209ad0
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
The automatically generated commit message of a merge should have the
same structure as in C Git for consistency (as per git fmt-merge-msg).
Before this change:
merging refs/heads/a into refs/heads/master
After:
Merge branch 'a'
Plurals, "into" and joining by "," and "and" also work.
Change-Id: I9658ce2817adc90d2df1060e8ac508d7bd0571cb
When --git-dir=X is given JGit creates a bare repository in the
directory X. However, when the --bare option is not explicitly
given, this is not properly reflected in the X/config file i.e.
the bare=true is missing. This change fixes this minor issue.
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
There were also some compiler warning due to empty catch blocks that
were fixed.
Change-Id: I165bcddcdfacd34f020d1b938a41954916eb106e
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
This mirrors the getByte() API in ObjectId and allows the caller to
modify a single byte, which is useful when updating it as part of a
loop walking through 0x00..0xff inside of a range of objects.
Change-Id: I57fa8420011fe5ed5fc6bfeb26f87a02b3197dab
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Processing git notes requires random access to part of the raw data
of each ObjectId... which isn't easy because ObjectIds are stored
with an internal representation of 5 ints. Expose random access
to the individual data bytes through new methods, avoiding the
need to convert first to a byte[20].
Change-Id: I99e64700b27fc0c95aa14ef8ad46a0e8832d4441
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Instead of hiding this logic inside of DirCacheTree and the legacy
Tree type, pull it into a common place where we can reuse it by
creating tree records in a buffer that can be passed directly into
the ObjectInserter. This allows us to avoid some copying, as the
inserter can be given the internal buffer of the formatter.
Because we trust these two callers to feed us records in the proper
order, without '/' in the names, and without duplicate names in the
same tree, we don't do any validation inside of the formatter itself.
To protect themselves from making ordering errors, developers should
continue to use DirCache to process edits to source code trees.
Change-Id: Idf7f10e736d4a44ccdf8afe060535d7b0554a92f
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The JGit merge algorithm or the Merge Command may have problems with handling
deletions always correctly. Therefore one additional test is added to check
this.
Change-Id: Id6aa49136996b29047c340994fe7faba68858e8c
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
JGit merge algorithm behaved differently from C Git when
we had adjacent modifications. If line 9 was modified by
OURS and line 10 by theirs then C Git will return a
conflict while JGit was seeing this as independent
modifications. This change is not only there to achieve
compatibility, but there where also some really wrong
merge results produced by JGit in the area of adjacent
modifications.
Change-Id: I8d77cb59e82638214e45b3cf9ce3a1f1e9b35c70
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Introduced similar helper methods than in AbstractDiffTestCase.
Then the test cases are much smaller and better understandable.
Change-Id: I2beb4db5a93bd8c0c1238d5d3039cbd6719eee90
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
When adding a new method near the end of the sequence we want to
show the full method inserted, and not tear the prior method due
to the common trailing curly brace being consumed as part of the
common end region of the sequences.
Bug: 328895
Change-Id: I233bc40445fb5452863f5fb082bc3097433a8da6
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This test isn't that useful. The better way to evaluate diff
algorithm performance is to run `jgit debug-diff-algorithms` over
real-world repositories, such as linux-2.6.git. Whenever we modify
an algorithm we should manually verify that its runtime performance
doesn't get any worse than it already is.
Change-Id: I0beed3a5a8a537c958a5a6438a1283f97fa2097a
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
HistogramDiff failed on cases where the initial element for the LCS
was actually very common (e.g. has 20 occurrences), and the first
element of the inserted region after the LCS was also common but
had fewer occurrences (e.g. 10), while the LCS also contained a
unique element (1 occurrence).
This happens often in Java source code. The initial element for
the LCS might be the empty line ("\n"), and the inserted but common
element might be "\t/**\n", with the LCS being a large span of
lines that contains unique method declarations. Even though "/**"
occurs less often than the empty line its not a better LCS if the
LCS we already have contains a unique element.
The logic in HistogramDiff would normally have worked fine, except I
tried to optimize scanning of B by making tryLongestCommonSequence
return the end of the region when there are matching elements
found in A. This allows us to skip over the current LCS region,
as it has already been examined, but caused us to fail to identify
an element that had a lower occurrence count within the region.
The solution used here is to trade space-for-time by keeping a
table of A positions to their occurrence counts. This allows the
matching logic to always use the smallest count for this region,
even if the smallest count doesn't appear on the initial element.
The new unit test testEdit_LcsContainsUnique() verifies this new
behavior works as expected.
Bug: 328895
Change-Id: Id170783b891f645b6a8cf6f133c6682b8de40aaf
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Fixes the "Method ignores results of InputStream.read()" warning.
This is the only place where read() was used instead of readFully()
and the return value was not checked. So it was either an oversight
or should be documented. This change assumes it was an oversight.
Change-Id: I859404a7d80449c538a552427787f3e57d7c92b4
The value was accessed every time in the loop body with get(),
so use the more efficient entrySet().
Change-Id: I91d90cbd0b0d03ca4a3db986c58b8d80d80f40a4
This was already disabled in the Eclipse preferences for the project.
With this, Hudson should also ignore it.
Change-Id: I7a6b9a20451dc5ba9a61553248b5f4b6c6c7a78b
As described in Bug 328551 there was a bug that the merge algorithm
was not always reporting conflicts when the same line was deleted
and modified. This problem was introduced during commit
0c017188b4 when reported conflicts have
been checked for common pre- and suffixes.
This was fixed here by better determining whether after stripping
off common prefixes and suffixes from a conflicting region there
is still some conflicting part left.
I also added a unit test to test this situation.
Bug: 328551
Change-Id: Iec6c9055d00e5049938484a27ab98dda2577afc4
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
When creating a local branch based on another local branch, the
upstream configuration contains "." as origin and the source branch
as "merge". The PullCommand should support this by skipping the
fetch step altogether and use the base branch to merge with.
Change-Id: I260a1771aeeffca5b0161d1494fd63c672ecc2a6
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
AmbiguousObjectException contains an AbbreviatedObjectId and is
supposed to be serializable, so it should be serializable as well.
Change-Id: I8056e78aee20fdd3cb9600b52cd8ed988544293d
It's probably not possible that these numbers are negative in the
algorithm, but it's cleaner this way and gets rid of three more
FindBugs warnings.
Change-Id: Ifbce4e2c787fb9a7cd309c605e8d86211ef8a352
Don't permit transient worker threads to access the underlying output
stream of a ProgressMonitor, as they might get marked as the stream's
writer thread. Instead proxy update events from the workers back onto
the application's real work thread. This ensures that the stream only
sees a single thread, and its the thread that will remain alive for
the entire life cycle of the operation.
This fixes IOException("Write end dead") during local repository fetch
when threaded delta search is enabled. One of the transient delta
search threads became the designated writer for the pipe, and when it
terminated the reader end thought the writer was dead, even though the
main writer thread was still executing in PackWriter.
Bug: 326557
Change-Id: I01d1b20a3d7be1c0b480c7fb5c9773c161fe5c15
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
RefsDirectory fires a RefsChangedEvent when it detect that one
ref changed (new, modified, deleted). But there was a potential
of wrong events beeing fired leading to a endless loop in EGit.
Problem is that when calling getRefs(ALL) we don't want to report
additional refs and by that we remove the additional refs from
the list of "refs reported upwards last time". We fire an
RefsChangedEvent because we think that the special refs are not
there anymore.
I fixed this by removing eventing for the additional refs. Another
alternative would be to always scan also for additional refs and
put them in the list of refs. But getRefs(ALL) would then remove
the additional refs again. I didn't do that for performance reasons
and also because I am not sure whether we want evnting for
additional refs.
Change-Id: Icb9398b55a8c6bbf03e38f6670feb67754ce91e0
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Chris Aniszczyk
Sasa Zivkov
Matthias Sohn
Christian Halstrick
Robin Stocker
Shawn Pearce
Mathias Kinzler