Bump upper end of range to 2020.
These copyright notices are user-facing; they're visible in several
dialogs in Eclipse. It is strange or even misleading to see a copyright
notice for JGit saying "2005, 2010" when there have been *many*
developments in the past ten years.
Change-Id: Idaa6244b2b3d9cecb29cc690085f8d008195cf12
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
This move avoids that all consumers of org.eclipse.jgit depend on Apache
httpclient. Also add another feature to make this optional for OSGi
consumers as well.
Change-Id: I5ef5e00c53678b9e1d7cfd54bbca3ff6f1c1c967
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Change-Id: I15cfd91857830d69abbe729be3e237fc9cd4fca0
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The Eclipse Foundation requires the standard SULA be present
in every feature. We had the license present via edl-v10.html
but we were missing the SULA via the license.html file. The
fix is to simply add the SULA.
Change-Id: I75b43ce098f544b95181755b5cc81a9b1dee6391
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
It is incorrect to use Eclipse.org as the providerName now,
we'll use Eclipse JGit.
Change-Id: I1621b93d4f401176704e7c43935a5ce0c8ee8419
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Technically our project name is "JGit", not "Java Git". In fact
there is already another project called "JavaGit" (no space) that we
don't want to become confused with. Ensure we always call ourselves
"JGit" in user visible assets, like the bundle name.
Other Eclipse products list their provider as "Eclipse.org",
not "eclipse.org". So list ourselves that way in all of our
plugin.properties files.
Change-Id: Ibcea1cd6dda2af757a8584099619fc23b7779a84
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
As discussed on the jgit-dev list here:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/egit-dev/msg00654.html
- Define a separate JGit feature.
- As of now create a separate JGit update site and zip it.
Change-Id: Ie4026f15f6250c4933dccf6f31b5009b90c036bc
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This restores the ability to build using just Eclipse without
strange procedures, extra plugins and it is again possible to
work on both JGit and EGit in the same Eclipse workspace with
ease.
Change-Id: I0af08127d507fbce186f428f1cdeff280f0ddcda
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Tycho isn't production ready for projects like JGit to be using as
their primary build driver. Some problems we ran into with Tycho
0.6.0 that are preventing us from using it are:
* Tycho can't run offline
The P2 artifact resolver cannot perform its work offline. If the
build system has no network connection, it cannot compile a
project through Tycho. This is insane for a distributed version
control system where developers are used to being offline during
development and local testing.
* Magic state in ~/.m2/repository/.meta/p2-metadata.properties
Earlier iterations of this patch tried to use a hybrid build,
where Tycho was only used for the Eclipse specific feature and P2
update site, and maven-bundle-plugin was used for the other code.
This build seemed to work, but only due to magic Tycho specific
state held in my local home directory. This means builds are not
consistently repeatable across systems, and lead me to believe
I had a valid build, when in fact I did not.
* Manifest-first build produces incomplete POMs
The POM created by the manifest-first build format does not
contain the dependency chain, leading a downstream consumer to
not import the runtime dependencies necessary to execute the
bundle it has imported. In JGit's case, this means JSch isn't
included in our dependency chain.
* Manifest-first build produces POMs unreadable by Maven 2.x
JGit has existing application consumers who are relying on
Maven 2.x builds. Forcing them to step up to an alpha release
of Maven 3 is simply unacceptable.
* OSGi bundle export data management is tedious
Editing each of our pom.xml files to mark a new release is
difficult enough as it is. Editing every MANIFEST.MF file to
list our exported packages and their current version number is
something a machine should do, not a human. Yet the Tycho OSGi
way unfortunately demands that a human do this work.
* OSGi bundle import data management is tedious
There isn't a way in the MANIFEST.MF file format to reuse the
same version tags across all of our imports, but we want to have
a consistent view of our dependencies when we compile JGit.
After wasting more than 2 full days trying to get Tycho to work,
I've decided its a lost cause right now. We need to be chasing down
bugs and critical features, not trying to bridge the gap between
the stable Maven repository format and the undocumented P2 format
used only by Eclipse.
So, switch the build to use Apache Felix's maven-bundle-plugin.
This is the same plugin Jetty uses to produce their OSGi bundle
manifests, and is the same plugin used by the Apache Felix project,
which is an open-source OSGi runtime. It has a reasonable number
of folks using it for production builds, and is running on top of
the stable Maven 2.x code base.
With this switch we get automatically generated MANIFEST.MF files
based on reasonably sane default rules, which reduces the amount
of things we have to maintain by hand. When necessary, we can add
a few lines of XML to our POMs to tweak the output.
Our build artifacts are still fully compatible with Maven 2.x, so
any downstream consumers are still able to use our build products,
without stepping up to Maven 3.x. Our artifacts are also valid as
OSGi bundles, provided they are organized on disk into a repository
that the runtime can read.
With maven-bundle-plugin the build runs offline, as much as Maven
2.x is able to run offline anyway, so we're able to return to a
distributed development environment again.
By generating MANIFEST.MF at the top level of each project (and
therefore outside of the target directory), we're still compatible
with Eclipse's PDE tooling. Our projects can be imported as standard
Maven projects using the m2eclipse plugin, but the PDE will think
they are vaild plugins and make them available for plugin builds,
or while debugging another workbench.
This change also completely removes Tycho from the build.
Unfortunately, Tycho 0.6.0's pom-first dependency resolver is broken
when resolving a pom-first plugin bundle through a manifest-first
feature package, so bundle org.eclipse.jgit can't be resolved,
even though it might actually exist in the local Maven repository.
Rather than fight with Tycho any further, I'm just declaring it
plugina-non-grata and ripping it out of the build.
Since there are very few tools to build a P2 format repository, and
no documentation on how to create one without running the Eclipse
UI manually by poking buttons, I'm declaring that we are not going
to produce a P2 update site from our automated builds.
Change-Id: If7938a86fb0cc8e25099028d832dbd38110b9124
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
[sp: Externalized all strings for translation]
Change-Id: Ib3f6e58e9e1cbcbc41705b6e1be37a89ca38f1a9
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Thomas Wolf
Matthias Sohn
Chris Aniszczyk
Shawn O. Pearce
Robin Rosenberg
Mykola Nikishov