Update existing @Nullable uses to use the JGit-internal version of the
annotation.
Change-Id: I95234ffad4c3110f9597fbd3a2760f653e22ecf7
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Commit 847b3d1 enabled annotation-based NPE analysis to JGit.
In so doing, it introduced a new dependency on the org.eclipse.jdt that
is undesirable. Follow Gerrit's lead by adding an internal Nullable type
(see
https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/stable-2.11/gerrit-common/src/main/java/com/google/gerrit/common/Nullable.java).
The javax.annotations.Nullable class uses a retention policy of RUNTIME,
whereas the org.eclipse.jdt.annotation.Nullable class used a policy of
CLASS. Since I'm not aware of tools that make use of the annotation at
runtime I chose the CLASS policy. If in the future there is a benefit to
retaining the annotations in the running binary we can update this
class.
Change-Id: I63dc8f9a6dc46b517cbde211bb5e2f8521a54d04
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
A CompressedBitmap represents a pair (EWAH bit vector, PackIndex
assigning bit positions to git objects). The bit vector is a member
field and the PackIndex is implicit via the 'this' reference to the
outer class.
Make this clearer by making CompressedBitmap a static class and
replacing the 'this' reference by an explicit field.
Likewise for CompressedBitmapBuilder.
Change-Id: Id85659fc4fc3ad82034db3370cce4cdbe0c5492c
Suggested-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
When creating bitmaps during gc, the bitmaps in tipCommitBitmaps are
built in setupTipCommitBitmaps using the following procedure:
0. create a bitmap ('reuse') that lists all ancestors of commits
whose existing bitmaps will be reused. I will call this the
reused part of history.
1. initialize a bitmap for each of the pack's "want"s by taking
a copy of the 'reuse' bitmap and setting the bit corresponding
to the one wanted commit.
2. walk through ancestors of wants, excluding the reused part of
history. Add parents of visited commits to bitmaps that have
those commits.
3. AND-NOT each tipCommitBitmap against the 'reuse' bitmap
4. Sort the bitmaps and AND-NOT each against the previous so they
partition the new commits.
The OR against 'reuse' in step 1 and the AND-NOT against 'reuse'
cancel each other out, except when commits from the reused part of
history are added to a bitmap in step 2. So avoid adding commits from
the reused part of history in step 2 and skip the OR and AND-NOT.
Performance impact (thanks to Terry for measuring):
The initial "selecting bitmaps" phase of garbage collection decreased
from (83 + 81 + 85) / 3 = 83 to (56 + 57 + 56) / 3 = 56.3, meaning
nearly a ~50% speedup of that phase.
Tested-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Change-Id: I26ea695809594347575d14a1d8e6721b8608eb9c
Instead of using the newRevFilter helper, call the appropriate
RevFilter constructor directly. This means one less hop to find
documentation about what the RevFilter will do.
Change-Id: Ida6ff1c0457a47a1bd1e4ed0fd1dd42a616d214f
When setupTipCommitBitmaps is called, writeBitmaps does not have any
bitmaps saved, so these calls to .add always add a single commit and
do not OR in a bitmap.
The objects returned by nextObject after a commit walk is finished
are trees and blobs. Non-commit objects do not have bitmaps
associated so the call to .add also can only add a single object.
Change-Id: I7b816145251a7fa4f1fffe0d03644257ea7f5440
* changes:
Remove BitmapRevFilter.getCountOfLoadedCommits
Make BitmapBuilder.getBitmapIndex public
Deprecate BitmapBuilder.add and introduce simpler addObject method
Add @Override annotations to BitmapIndexImpl
Rely on bitmap RevFilter to filter walk during bitmap selection
Use 'reused' bitmap to filter walk during bitmap selection
Rely on bitmap RevFilter to filter tip commit setup walk
Use 'reused' bitmap to filter tip commit setup walk
Include ancestors of reused bitmap commits in reuse bitmap again
This is the caller that the BitmapBuilder.add method was designed
around. Moving away from .add makes it more verbose but hopefully
clearer.
Change-Id: I57b1d7c1dc8fb800b242b76c606922b5aa36b9b2
This puts the code for include() in each RevFilter returned by
newRevFilter in one place and should make the code easier to
understand and modify.
Change-Id: I590ac4604b61fc1ffe7aba2ed89f8139847ccac3
The count of loaded commits is equal to the number of commits returned
by the walk. Simplify BitmapRevFilter by counting them in the caller.
Change-Id: Ia95da47831d9e89d6f8068470ec4529aaabfa7dd
Every Bitmap in current JGit code has an associated BitmapIndex. Make
it public in BitmapBuilder to make retrieving bitmaps to OR in from
that index easier.
Change-Id: I2773aa94d8b67f12194608e6317c0792a5de21e2
The BitmapIndex.BitmapBuilder.add API is subtle:
/**
* Adds the id and the existing bitmap for the id, if one
* exists, to the bitmap.
*
* @return true if the value was not contained or able to be
* loaded.
*/
boolean add(AnyObjectId objectId, int type);
Reading the name of the method does not make it obvious what it will
do. Does it add the named object to the bitmap, or all objects
reachable from it? It depends on whether the BitmapIndex owns an
existing bitmap for that object. I did not notice this subtlety when
skimming the javadoc, either. This resulted in enough confusion to
subtly break the bitmap building code (see change
I30844134bfde0cbabdfaab884c84b9809dd8bdb8 for details).
So discourage use of the add() API by deprecating it.
To replace it, provide a addObject() method that adds a single object.
This way, callers can decide whether to use addObject() or or() based
on the context.
For example,
if (bitmap.add(c, OBJ_COMMIT)) {
for (RevCommit p : c.getParents()) {
rememberToAlsoHandle(p);
}
}
can be replaced with
if (bitmap.contains(c)) {
// already included
} else if (index.getBitmap(c) != null) {
bitmap.or(index.getBitmap(c));
} else {
bitmap.addObject(c, OBJ_COMMIT);
for (RevCommit p : c.getParents()) {
rememberToAlsoHandle(p);
}
}
which is more verbose but makes it clearer that the behavior
depends on the content of index.getBitmaps().
Change-Id: Ib745645f187e1b1483f8587e99501dfcb7b867a5
This makes it easier to distinguish between implementations of methods
from the interface from helpers internal to org.eclipse.jgit.internal.storage.*.
This was illegal in Java 5 but JGit requires newer Java these days.
Change-Id: I92c65f3407a334acddd32ec9e09ab7d1d39c4dc6
This RevWalk filters out reused bitmap commits via the 'reuse' bitmap.
Avoid possible wasted time and complexity by not also redundantly
marking them UNINTERESTING.
Change-Id: Ibb714002ddac599963d148a9aab90645fcc73141
When building fullBitmap in order to determine which ancestor chain to
add this commit to, we were excluding the ancestors of reusedCommits
using markUninteresting. This use of markUninteresting is a bit
wasteful because we already have a bitmap indicating exactly which
commits should be excluded (which can save some walking). Use it.
A separate commit will remove the now-redundant markUninteresting
call.
No behavior change intended (except for performance improvement).
Change-Id: I1112641852d72aa05c9a8bd08a552c70342ccedb
This RevWalk filters out reused bitmap commits via the 'reuse' bitmap.
Avoid possible wasted time and complexity by not redundantly marking
them UNINTERESTING any more.
Change-Id: If467ccd1d75e17cf9367b2a0399fca3f9d52adf9
When garbage collecting, we decide to reuse some bitmaps in older
history from the previous pack to save time. The remainder of commit
selection only involves commits not covered by those bitmaps.
Currently we carry that out in two ways:
1. by building a bitmap representing the already-covered commits,
for easy containment checks and AND-NOT-ing against
2. by marking the reused bitmap commits as uninteresting in the
RevWalk that finds new commits
The mechanism in (2) is less efficient than (1): rw.next() will walk
back from reused bitmap commits to check whether the commit it is
about to emit is an ancestor of them, when using the bitmap from (1)
would let us perform the same check with a single contains() call.
Add a RevFilter teaching the RevWalk to perform that same check
directly using the bitmap from (1).
The next time the RevWalk is used, a different RevFilter is installed
so this does not break that.
A later commit will drop the markUninteresting calls.
No functional change intended except a possible speedup.
Change-Id: Ic375210fa69330948be488bf9dbbe4cb0d069ae6
Prior to this change, DfsInserter would not insert an object into a pack
if it already existed in another pack in the repository, even if that
pack was unreachable. Consider this sequence of events:
- Object FOO is pushed to a repository.
- Subsequent ref changes make FOO UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE.
- FOO is subsequently re-inserted using a DfsInserter, but skipped
due to existing in UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE.
- The repository is repacked; FOO will not be written into a new pack
because it is not yet reachable from a reference. If the
UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE packs are deleted, FOO disappears.
- A reference is updated to reference FOO. This reference is now broken
as FOO was removed when the repacking process deleted the
UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE pack that stored the only copy of FOO.
The garbage collector can't safely delete the UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE
pack because FOO might be in the middle of being re-inserted/re-packed.
This change writes a duplicate copy of an object if it only exists in
UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE. This "freshens" the object to give it a chance to
survive long enough to be made reachable through a reference.
Change-Id: I20f2062230f3af3bccd6f21d3b7342f1152a5532
Signed-off-by: Mike Williams <miwilliams@google.com>
Until 320a4142 (Update bitmap selection throttling to fully span
active branches, 2015-10-20), setupTipCommitBitmaps contained code
along the following lines:
for (PackBitmapIndexRemapper.Entry entry : bitmapRemapper) {
if (!reuse(entry))
continue;
RevCommit rc = (RevCommit) rw.peel(rw.parseAny(entry));
reuseCommits.add(new BitmapCommit(rc));
EWAHCompressedBitmap bitmap =
remap.ofObjectType(remap.getBitmap(rc), OBJ_COMMIT);
writeBitmaps.addBitmap(rc, bitmap, 0);
reuse.add(rc, OBJ_COMMIT);
}
writeBitmaps.clearBitmaps(); // Remove temporary bitmaps
This loop OR-ed together bitmaps for commits whose bitmaps would be
reused. A subtle point is the use of the add() method, which ORs in a
bitmap from the BitmapIndex when it exists and falls back to OR-ing in
a single bit when that bitmap does not exist in the BitmapIndex.
Commit 320a4142 removed the addBitmap step, so the bitmap does not
exist in the BitmapIndex and the fallback behavior is triggered.
Simplify and restore the intended behavior by avoiding use of the
subtle use of the add() method --- use or() directly instead.
Change-Id: I30844134bfde0cbabdfaab884c84b9809dd8bdb8
When packing is able to reuse lots of deltas from existing packs, those
objects are marked as "doNotAttemptDelta" and do not contribute to
DeltaTask's computeTopPaths() "totalWeight" calculation.
In the extreme case when all packs are reusable, "totalWeight" will be
zero. DeltaTask.partitionTasks() uses "totalWeight" to determine a
"weightPerThread" size it uses to set up DeltaTasks. When "totalWeight"
is small, partitionTasks() ends up creating a DeltaTask for every
unique path.
For a large repository, the small "weightPerThread" can result in the
creation of >100k tasks (for the MSM 3.10 Linux repository, the count
was ~150k). This makes the "task stealing" mechanism in DeltaTask very
inefficient, because every attempt to steal work does a linear walk
through all tasks, searching for the one with the most work remaining,
which is O(N^2) comparisons. For the MSM 3.10 repository when all
deltas were reusable, PackWriter.parallelDeltaSearch() took
(1615+1633+1458)/3 = 1568 seconds.
The error is that DeltaTask treats the weights of objects marked as
"doNotAttemptDelta" inconsistently. It ignores the weights when
calculating "totalWeight" but uses them when partitioning the tasks.
The fix is to also ignore them when partitioning the tasks.
With this patch applied, PackWriter.parallelDeltaSearch() on the
MSM 3.10 repository when all deltas are reused went from taking
1568 seconds to 62ms (>25k speedup).
This patch also fixes a totalWeight initialization error in
DeltaTask.computeTopPaths().
Change-Id: I2ae37efa83bca42b0e716266ae6aa9d182e76d9c
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Avoid leaving the reader in suspense by handling the unusual
(!RevCommit) case first. As a nice side effect, there is less nesting
to keep track of in the rest of the loop body.
No functional change intended.
Change-Id: I1580de444fccde08070f696218c12041151a924a
When the file <git-dir>/hooks/pre-push exists make sure that is is
executing during a push. The pre-push hook runs during git push, after
the remote refs have been updated but before any objects have been
transferred.
Change-Id: Ibbb58ee3227742d1a2f913134ce11e7a135c7f4c
In order to support filters in gitattributes FS.runProcess() is made
public. Support for stdin redirection has been added. Support for binary
data on stdin/stdout (as used be clean/smudge filters) has been added.
Change-Id: Ice2c152e9391368dc5748d7b825a838e3eb755f9
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fixed random errors in discoverGitSystemConfig() on Linux where the
process error stream was closed by readPipe() before or while
GobblerThread was reading from it.
Marked readPipe() as @Nullable and fixed potential NPE in
discoverGitSystemConfig() on readPipe() return value.
Fixed process error output randomly mixed with other threads log
messages.
Change-Id: Id882af2762cfb75f010f693b2e1c46eb6968ee82
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
When commits are selected for bitmap generation, they are reordered
so that related "chains" of commits are grouped together. Chains are
"subbranches" of commits that may branch off of and re-merge with the
main line. Grouping by chains means that the XOR difference between
consecutive selected commits will be smaller, resulting in better
run-length compression of the XORed bitmaps.
Add a new testSelectionOrderingWithChains() test in a new
GcCommitSelectionTest test class. Also move related GC commit selection
tests out of GcBasicPackingTest and into GcCommitSelectionTest.
Change-Id: I8e80cac29c4ca8193b41c9898e5436c22a659f11
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Add comments and rename variables in PackWriterBitmapPreparer to improve
readability.
Change-Id: I49e7a1c35307298f7bc32ebfc46ab08e94290125
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Java compiler must generate synthetic access methods for private methods
and fields of the enclosing class if they are accessed from inner
classes and vice versa.
While invisible in the code, those synthetic access methods exist in the
bytecode and seem to produce some extra execution overhead at runtime
(compared with the direct access to this fields or methods), see
https://git.eclipse.org/r/58948/.
By removing the "private" access modifier from affected methods and
fields we help compiler to avoid generation of synthetic access methods
and hope to improve execution performance.
To validate changes, one can either use javap or use Bytecode Outline
plugin in Eclipse. In both cases one should look for "synthetic
access$<number>" methods at the end of the class and inner class files
in question - there should be none.
NB: don't mix this "synthetic access$" methods up with "public synthetic
bridge" methods generated to allow generic method override return types.
Change-Id: I94fb481b68c84841c1db1a5ebe678b13e13c962b
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Java compiler must generate synthetic access methods for private methods
and fields of the enclosing class if they are accessed from inner
classes and vice versa.
While invisible in the code, those synthetic access methods exist in the
bytecode and seem to produce some extra execution overhead at runtime
(compared with the direct access to this fields or methods), see
https://git.eclipse.org/r/58948/.
By removing the "private" access modifier from affected methods and
fields we help compiler to avoid generation of synthetic access methods
and hope to improve execution performance.
To validate changes, one can either use javap or use Bytecode Outline
plugin in Eclipse. In both cases one should look for "synthetic
access$<number>" methods at the end of the class and inner class files
in question - there should be none.
NB: don't mix this "synthetic access$" methods up with "public synthetic
bridge" methods generated to allow generic method override return types.
Change-Id: Ie7b65f251ec4452d5a5ed48aa0f272cf49a9aecd
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Java compiler must generate synthetic access methods for private methods
and fields of the enclosing class if they are accessed from inner
classes and vice versa.
While invisible in the code, those synthetic access methods exist in the
bytecode and seem to produce some extra execution overhead at runtime
(compared with the direct access to this fields or methods), see
https://git.eclipse.org/r/58948/.
By removing the "private" access modifier from affected methods and
fields we help compiler to avoid generation of synthetic access methods
and hope to improve execution performance.
To validate changes, one can either use javap or use Bytecode Outline
plugin in Eclipse. In both cases one should look for "synthetic
access$<number>" methods at the end of the class and inner class files
in question - there should be none.
NB: don't mix this "synthetic access$" methods up with "public synthetic
bridge" methods generated to allow generic method override return types.
Change-Id: I0ebaeb2bc454cd8051b901addb102c1a6688688b
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Java compiler must generate synthetic access methods for private methods
and fields of the enclosing class if they are accessed from inner
classes and vice versa.
While invisible in the code, those synthetic access methods exist in the
bytecode and seem to produce some extra execution overhead at runtime
(compared with the direct access to this fields or methods), see
https://git.eclipse.org/r/58948/.
By removing the "private" access modifier from affected methods and
fields we help compiler to avoid generation of synthetic access methods
and hope to improve execution performance.
To validate changes, one can either use javap or use Bytecode Outline
plugin in Eclipse. In both cases one should look for "synthetic
access$<number>" methods at the end of the class and inner class files
in question - there should be none.
NB: don't mix this "synthetic access$" methods up with "public synthetic
bridge" methods generated to allow generic method override return types.
Change-Id: If53ec94145bae47b74e2561305afe6098012715c
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Terry Parker
Jonathan Nieder
Matthias Sohn
Mike Williams
Shawn Pearce
Marc Strapetz
Christian Halstrick
Andrey Loskutov
Kaloyan Raev