Remove the JDK_HOME settings that were introduced to build against the
Java 1.7 libraries. Now that the minimum requirement is Java 1.8, this
is wrong and prevents use of Java 1.8 features.
Change-Id: I91a194c9449d7810ef02b038907dbbc708e600a5
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
When compiling jgit using Java 8 set system property JDK_HOME to
JAVA_HOME path of JDK7 installation to compile against JDK 7 class
libraries. Otherwise jgit may hit runtime exceptions when running on
Java 7 (e.g. return type of ConcurrentHashMap.keySet() in JDK 8 class
library doesn't exist in JDK 7).
Example:
$ mvn clean install -DJDK_HOME=/.../jdk1.7.0_80.jdk/Contents/Home
Bug: 496262
Change-Id: Ib6abe5e544e0492e08b342e1a34b182caf25f94f
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
also use the Neon target platform as the default target platform.
Neon Eclipse platform requires BREE 8 so we have to use Java 8 at least
for the JGit packaging build (for the compiler settings we still stick
to source and target 1.7 since we want to still support Java 7)
otherwise unpacking platform pack200 archives will fail since they are
built using Java 8 and hence cannot be unpacked using Java 7's
unpack200.
Update org.junit from 4.11 to 4.11 and org.apache.ant from from 1.9.2 to
1.9.6 since the older versions are not available in Neon orbit version
Ignore a couple of tests in ResourceUtilTest which now fail [1] since
bug 476585 was fixed in Neon M6.
CQ: 10694
CQ: 11308
Change-Id: I1a99a3ac2148693e21c57df5aeb848035b52b97b
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Creates a source directory under org.eclipse.jgit.http.test
for the new support class.
Signed-off-by: Michael Edgar <adgar@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie49492c2bbe5c1db96ceb0dc06fa7cb9f927431a
Implement LfsProtocolServlet handling the "Git LFS v1 Batch API"
protocol [1]. Add a simple file system based LFS content store and the
debug-lfs-store command to simplify testing.
Introduce a LargeFileRepository interface to enable additional storage
implementation while reusing the same protocol implementation.
At the client side we have to configure the lfs.url, specify that
we use the batch API and we don't use authentication:
[lfs]
url = http://host:port/lfs
batch = true
[lfs "http://host:port/lfs"]
access = none
the git-lfs client appends the "objects/batch" to the lfs.url.
Hard code an Authorization header in the FileLfsRepository.getAction
because then git-lfs client will skip asking for credentials. It will
just forward the Authorization header from the response to the
download/upload request.
The FileLfsServlet supports file content storage for "Large File
Storage" (LFS) server as defined by the Github LFS API [2].
- upload and download of large files is probably network bound hence use
an asynchronous servlet for good scalability
- simple object storage in file system with 2 level fan-out
- use LockFile to protect writing large objects against multiple
concurrent uploads of the same object
- to prevent corrupt uploads the uploaded file is rejected if its hash
doesn't match id given in URL
The debug-lfs-store command is used to run the LfsProtocolServlet and,
optionally, the FileLfsServlet which makes it easier to setup a
local test server.
[1]
https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/http-v1-batch.md
[2] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api
Bug: 472961
Change-Id: I7378da5575159d2195138d799704880c5c82d5f3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
We will use gson to implement the LFS REST API.
CQ: 9966
Change-Id: I7feb6b2b8f7b736888370aad94e4c436ae6014bb
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The Large File Storage extension specified by GitHub [1] uses SHA-256 to
compute the ID of large files stored by the extension. Hence implement a
SHA-256 abstraction similar to the SHA-1 abstraction used by JGit.
[1] https://git-lfs.github.com/
Bug: 470333
Change-Id: I3a95954543c8570d73929e55f4a884b55dbf1b7a
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Since we use the reporting plugins only in the parent pom.xml there's no
point in using the new pluginManagement tag in the reporting section
which was introduced to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSITE-443
Change-Id: I750ca3765e95afb06609a362fb3354afc3b66b90
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Clirr doesn't support Java 8 hence use japicmp instead.
See https://github.com/siom79/japicmp
Change-Id: If4b30a6d6aa849b4d6b3b0c900558c609822840c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Thomas Wolf
Matthias Sohn
Mike Edgar