The statement:
assertThat(recvStream.available(), is(0));
results in a warning from Eclipse:
The expression of type int is boxed into Integer
because recvStream.available() returns int, but the hamcrest is()
method takes an Integer.
Replace it with the equivalent JUnit assertion.
Also remove the suppression of another similar warning and fix that
in the same way.
Change-Id: I6f18b304a540bcd0a10aec7d3abc7dc6f047fe80
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
In order to support GPG-signed commits, add some methods which will
allow GPG signatures to be parsed out of RevCommit objects.
Later, we can add code to verify the signatures.
Change-Id: Ifcf6b3ac79115c15d3ec4b4eaed07315534d09ac
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Use existing test utility methods instead of nested PrintWriter usage.
Change-Id: I324852c7971ae644fa499f377a31d1cf265c7fd9
Signed-off-by: René Scheibe <rene.scheibe@gmail.com>
ErrorProne warns [1] about implicit use of the platform default charset,
which can result in differing behaviour between JVM executions or
incorrect behavior if the encoding of the data source doesn't match
expectations.
[1] http://errorprone.info/bugpattern/DefaultCharset
Change-Id: I0fd489d352170339c3867355cd24324dfdbd4b59
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Client will stop sending haves when the number of haves sent reaches maxhaves.
Change-Id: I1e5b1525be4c67f20a81ca24a2770c20eb5c1271
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
The parsing code for protocol v2 fetch doesn't have any dependency on
the rest of UploadPack.
Move it to its own class. This makes testing easier (no need to
instantiate the full UploadPack), simplifies the code in UploadPack and
increases modularity.
At the moment, the parser needs to know about the reference database to
validate incoming references. This dependency could be easily removed
moving the validation later in the flow, after the parsing, where other
validations are already happening. Postponing that to keep this patch
about moving unmodified code around.
Change-Id: I7ad29a6b99caa7c12c06f5a7f30ab6a5f6e44dc7
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
At the moment there are two copies of the client shallow commit list:
one in the request and another in the clientShallowCommits member of
the class.
The verifyShallowCommit function was removing missing object ids
from the member but not the request list, and code afterwards was
using the request's version.
In practice, this didn't cause trouble because these shallow commits
are used as endpoint for a walk, and missing ids are just never reached.
Change-Id: I70a8f1fd46de135da09f16e5d954693c8438ffcb
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
This test was never being run. Since it was introduced it was
named "notest.." which meant it didn't run with JUnit3, and
since it is not annotated @Test it also doesn't run with JUnit4.
When compiling with Bazel 0.6.0, error-prone raises an error
that the public method is not annotated with @Ignore or @Test.
Given that the test has never been run anyway, we can just
remove it.
Bug: 525415
Change-Id: Ie9a54f89fe42e0c201f547ff54ff1d419ce37864
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Renamed and restructured tests for improved clarity.
Bug: 479266
Change-Id: Ic9d05ddf722bddd148fa9d9c19248dd53d97f1e4
Signed-off-by: René Scheibe <rene.scheibe@gmail.com>
On recent VMs, collection.toArray(new T[0]) is faster than
collection.toArray(new T[collection.size()]). Since it is also more
readable, it should now be the preferred way of collection to array
conversion.
https://shipilev.net/blog/2016/arrays-wisdom-ancients/
Change-Id: I80388532fb4b2b0663ee1fe8baa94f5df55c8442
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
If packed refs are used, duplicate updates result in an exception
because JGit tries to lock the same lock file twice. With non-atomic
ref updates, this used to work, since the same ref would simply be
locked and updated twice in succession.
Let's be more lenient in this case and remove duplicates before
trying to do the ref updates. Silently skip duplicate updates
for the same ref, if they both would update the ref to the same
object ID. (If they don't, behavior is undefined anyway, and we
still throw an exception.)
Add a test that results in a duplicate ref update for a tag.
Bug: 529400
Change-Id: Ide97f20b219646ac24c22e28de0c194a29cb62a5
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Bug: 529314
Change-Id: I91eaeda8a988d4786908fba6de00478cfc47a2a2
Signed-off-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Change-Id: I2442394fb7eae5b3715779555477dd27b274ee83
Signed-off-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
The TransportLocal object created in
newTransportLocalWithStrictValidation() closes original repository and
increments use of test internal "dst" repository, but never decrements
use. Because of this, pack file is not closed and during tearDown on
Windows system is unable to delete it.
Bug: 538068
Change-Id: I96df8e91abfee78c91cf26c2466718e9145a69db
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
In Git protocol v2, UploadPack and ReceivePack have the same
capabilities and can process any protocol v2 request. For example, a
client can sent a "fetch" command to the "/git-receive-pack" endpoint.
This makes it difficult for existing hook interfaces. For example,
PreUploadHook takes UploadPack, but a "fetch" command may be received by
ReceivePack.
To resolve this skew, this change introduce a different hook interface
for the protocol v2. The hook takes a request that is independent to the
handlers (UploadPack, ReceivePack). Also this makes it clear what
parameters the hook is counting on, instead of keep track of the hook
using getters from UploadPack / ReceivePack.
Bug: 534847
Change-Id: I71f3266584483db1e2b2edfc1a72d0bdf1bb6041
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
When fetching with protocol v2, git expects the shallow-info section to
appear before wanted-refs if both appear in the response. Teach
UploadPack to do this.
Change-Id: Ie26a91edcce5d27a1d727d7fba5c30e1144e118b
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
ResolveMerger.checkout() and cleanUp() check out files directly and
must honor CR/LF settings and also smudge filters.
Deprecate the 3-argument version of DirCacheCheckout.checkoutEntry().
It isn't used anymore anywhere in JGit (nor in EGit).
Bug: 537410
Change-Id: I062b35401c8bd5bc99deb2f68f91089a0643504c
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
UploadPack already allows the client to send wanted OIDs as "want"
lines. Extend UploadPack to also allow the client to send wanted ref
names as "want-ref" lines when the fetch is done using protocol v2.
The corresponding Git commit is 516e2b76bd ("upload-pack: implement
ref-in-want", 2018-06-28).
To support a two-stage rollout, two configuration variables are
provided: uploadpack.allowrefinwant (default "false") allows clients to
specify "want-ref" in their requests, and uploadpack.advertiserefinwant
(default "true") makes UploadPack advertise this capability. If
uploadpack.allowrefinwant is true but uploadpack.advertiserefinwant is
false, UploadPack will not advertise that it supports "want-ref", but it
will support it.
Change-Id: I3c24077949640d453af90d81a7f48ce4b8ac9833
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Two submodules at the same path on different branches need not represent
the same repository, and two submodules at different paths can represent
the same one.
The C Git implementation uses the submodule name to internally manage
the submodule repositories under .git/modules. When a submodule
represents different repositories in different branches, it makes a
conflict inside .git/modules.
The current RepoCommand implementation uses submodule paths as the
submodule names. When the manifest file mounts different repositories to
the same path in different branches, this makes a situation described
above. To solve this issue, we can use the project name instead of
the path as the submodule name.
On the other hand, since repo v1.12.8~3^2 (repo: Support multiple
branches for the same project., 2013-10-11), a manifest file can mount
the same project to different paths. If we naively use the project
name as the submodule name, it makes a conflict in .git/modules, too.
This patch uses the project name as the submodule name basically, but
when the same project is mounted to different paths, it uses the project
name and path as the submodule name.
Change-Id: I09dc7d62ba59016fe28852d3139a56ef7ef49b8f
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
Reported-by: JP Sugarbroad <jpsugar@google.com>