Support the deepen-since parameter when requested by a client using
protocol v2. This is done by:
- adding a DepthWalk.RevWalk#setDeepenSince method
- updating DepthGenerator to recognize when deepen-since is set
- recording in DepthWalk.Commit whether a commit is a boundary commit
Existing users of DepthWalk such as UploadPack previously recognized
boundary commits by comparing their depths against the threshold, not
tracking whether any parents were truly excluded. This behavior is
preserved - UploadPack considers a commit as boundary if its depth is
equal to the threshold *or* a parent was excluded (whether by depth or
by deepen-since).
Change-Id: I852bba6b1279f9cc8aee38282e9339d62b8dcddc
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
In DepthGenerator, commits are always added to the "pending" queue
either at depth 0 (in the constructor) or after a depth check (in
next()), so it is redundant to check for depth after removing them from
the queue. Remove the check.
This redundancy seems to have been present since the introduction of
server-side shallow clone support in commit 9952223e06 ("Implement
server support for shallow clones", 2011-08-21).
Change-Id: Iad334935293367400c2901a25c0f4bf36c437cf2
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Replace explicit construction of BufferedReader with calls to the
utility method Files.newBufferedReader, which allows to specify
the charset.
Change-Id: I61b9451dbc8d9cf83fc8a5981292b8fdc713ce37
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
As reported by Error Prone:
An inner class should be static unless it references members of its
enclosing class. An inner class that is made non-static unnecessarily
uses more memory and does not make the intent of the class clear.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ClassCanBeStatic
Change-Id: Ib99d120532630dba63cf400cc1c61c318286fc41
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Support multiple prefixes when querying references to allow
implementor to minimize number of RPC calls.
Change-Id: I5f822fd7eaf9756b44750080d3056de138b64f4a
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
The commit message template contains a superfluous blank at the end of
the first line, which is deleted by this change. This is only relevant
for jgit contributors using Eclipse, not for jgit users.
Change-Id: I462deb49c26fb64b3dc2d1d75f1e40ef302b0fc9
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
This is a base change which prepares for subsequent bugfixes.
Change-Id: Iaadc93df37e45753d700be73669e68c03590adb5
Signed-off-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
This happened if the LockTokens hard link was already deleted earlier.
Bug: 531759
Change-Id: Idc84bd695fac1a763b3cbb797c9c4c636a16e329
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Otherwise fetching all tags may pull in commits not on the
specified branches. Canonical git also does this.[1]
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/b160b6e69/builtin/clone.c#L1124
Bug: 538768
Change-Id: If0ac75fb9fae0c95d1a48b22954c54d4c3c09a47
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
When not all branches are cloned, the fetch refspec for the
remote should not be "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*":
that would fetch all branches on the very next fetch, thus
making a clone with only a subset of the branches rather
pointless.
Instead, produce refspecs for the cloned branches only.
Canonical git also does this for its --single-branch case;
it doesn't have an option to clone only a subset of the branches
(only one or all).
Bug: 466858
Change-Id: Ie871880f757663437efac1e8b3313094f9e629b3
Also-by: Julian Enoch <julian.enoch@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Enoch <julian.enoch@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fetch code has been moved to a ProtocolV2Parser, but ls-refs code is
still in UploadPack.
Moving it to the parser makes it easier to test, keeps the parsing
together and makes the two commands follow similar structure.
Change-Id: I573ce543e804ddeb9f83303b4af250b7cddc8cad
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
UploadPack.processShallow is doing too many things and offering a
confusing API. It is filtering or splitting commit ids depending
if a parameter is null and writing them out (or not) depending on another
flag.
Iterate the list and announce to Consumers what object ids need
to be marked as (un)shallow. They decide what to do with them.
As java consumers don't allow to propagate exceptions, define
our own functional interface for it.
Change-Id: I619cf2eed9b1e0338151120b8ef87a463fbe8827
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
shallowCommits variable is nullable only to signal later
if code has gone through the processShallow code.
Use a flag to indicate that condition and make shallowCommits
non-nullable. This makes code clearer and paves the way to untangle
processShallow in a follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I898e6aaf6f860bb6afafbac05653ba116c9b2da6
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
If some process executed by FS#readPipe ends in an error,
the error stream is never set as errorMessage because
FS#GobblerThread#waitForProcessCompletion always returned true.
This caused LOG#warn to be called with null.
Return false whenever FS#GobblerThread#waitForProcessCompletion fails.
Bug: 538723
Change-Id: Ic9492bd688431d52c8665f7a2efec2989e95a4ce
Signed-off-by: Cliffred van Velzen <cliffred@cliffred.nl>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Change-Id: Icec16c01853a3f5ea016d454b3d48624498efcce
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5e68fe245f)
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
This is actually a fairly common occurrence; deleting the parent
directories can work only if the file deleted was the last one
in the directory.
Bug: 537872
Change-Id: I86d1d45e1e2631332025ff24af8dfd46c9725711
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
(cherry picked from commit d9e767b431)
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
According to String.replaceAll JavaDoc:
"Note that backslashes (\) and dollar signs ($) in the replacement
string may cause the results to be different than if it were being
treated as a literal replacement string; see Matcher.replaceAll. Use
java.util.regex.Matcher.quoteReplacement to suppress the special meaning
of these characters, if desired."
Bug: 536318
Change-Id: Ib70cfec41bf73e14d23d94d14aee05a25b1e87f6
Signed-off-by: Markus Duft <markus.duft@ssi-schaefer.com>
FS_POSIX.createNewFile(File) failed to properly implement atomic file
creation on NFS using the algorithm [1]:
- name of the hard link must be unique to prevent that two processes
using different NFS clients try to create the same link. This would
render nlink useless to detect if there was a race.
- the hard link must be retained for the lifetime of the file since we
don't know when the state of the involved NFS clients will be
synchronized. This depends on NFS configuration options.
To fix these issues we need to change the signature of createNewFile
which would break API. Hence deprecate the old method
FS.createNewFile(File) and add a new method createNewFileAtomic(File).
The new method returns a LockToken which needs to be retained by the
caller (LockFile) until all involved NFS clients synchronized their
state. Since we don't know when the NFS caches are synchronized we need
to retain the token until the corresponding file is no longer needed.
The LockToken must be closed after the LockFile using it has been
committed or unlocked. On Posix, if core.supportsAtomicCreateNewFile =
false this will delete the hard link which guarded the atomic creation
of the file. When acquiring the lock fails ensure that the hard link is
removed.
[1] https://www.time-travellers.org/shane/papers/NFS_considered_harmful.html
also see file creation flag O_EXCL in
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
Change-Id: I84fcb16143a5f877e9b08c6ee0ff8fa4ea68a90d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When core.supportsAtomicCreateNewFile was set to false and the
repository was located on a filesystem which doesn't support the file
attribute "unix:nlink" then FS_POSIX#createNewFile may report an error
even if everything was ok. Modify FS_POSIX#createNewFile to silently
ignore this situation. An example of such a filesystem is sshfs where
reading "unix:nlink" always returns 1 (instead of throwing a exception).
Bug: 537969
Change-Id: I6deda7672fa7945efa8706ea1cd652272604ff19
Also-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
David Pursehouse
Jonathan Tan
Matthias Sohn
Minh Thai
Michael Keppler
Marc Strapetz
Thomas Wolf
Ivan Frade
Cliffred van Velzen
Markus Duft
Christian Halstrick