This was a copy-artifact when the bundle was created. This chanhe
removed some warnings in Eclipse.
Change-Id: I32acdf4b60bf5528566e66b1fd82113b1343ed37
Making the methods static would gain little in performance,
make the code harder to change. Removing unncessary warnings
is more important.
Change-Id: If3e6aa9c1d92e58b4e7a8e246cf4aace237d7a7b
These settings were added by Eclipse simply by touching
the project settings. Adding these makes it simpler to see
what local changes have been made.
Change-Id: Iab0aa62530312eb0c78b03b5c6a632742bcc4978
Stepping past the '.git' entry with `fti.next(1)` is unnecessary and in
fact a bug, as the subsequent access to FileTreeIterator is past it's
end-of-file - it has only 1 valid entry ('link').
This bug is only visibly exposed in certain environments depending on the
(unguaranteed) return order of `java.io.File.listFiles()`. On my box
FileTreeIteratorJava7Test would fail consistently for these 3 tests:
* testSymlinkActuallyModified
* testSymlinkNotModifiedThoughNormalized
* testSymlinkModifiedNotNormalized
They all failed in the same way:
testSymlinkActuallyModified(org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.FileTreeIteratorJava7Test) Time elapsed: 0.063 sec <<< ERROR!
org.eclipse.jgit.api.errors.JGitInternalException: /home/roberto/development/jgit/org.eclipse.jgit.java7.test/target/jgit_test_9202429389985749040_tmp
/tmp_807992722429349842/.git (Is a directory)
at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method)
at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(FileInputStream.java:146)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.FileTreeIterator$FileEntry.openInputStream(FileTreeIterator.java:210)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.WorkingTreeIterator.readContentAsNormalizedString(WorkingTreeIterator.java:984)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.WorkingTreeIterator.contentCheck(WorkingTreeIterator.java:924)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.WorkingTreeIterator.isModified(WorkingTreeIterator.java:860)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.WorkingTreeIterator.isModified(WorkingTreeIterator.java:815)
at org.eclipse.jgit.treewalk.FileTreeIteratorJava7Test.testSymlinkActuallyModified(FileTreeIteratorJava7Test.java:198)
Theses tests are all working with a small repo that has just two entries:
'.git' and 'link' (a symbolic link that's being tested on). `listFiles()`
is called by FileTreeIterator to get a preliminary list of FileEntry
objects:
https://github.com/eclipse/jgit/blob/6d724dcd/org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/treewalk/FileTreeIterator.java#L139
Whether your tests appeared to pass or fail was dependent on the returned
order of files from `listFiles()`:
* ['.git', 'link'] - PASS (Eclipse Hudson appears to get this ordering)
* ['link', '.git'] - FAIL (My env, Ubuntu 14.04/Java 1.7.0_55)
The tree-iterator passes the resulting `FileEntry`s to it's init() method:
https://github.com/eclipse/jgit/blob/6d724dcd/org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/treewalk/WorkingTreeIterator.java#L639-L665
... where a count of valid entries is made (`entryCnt`), the 'invalid'
entries (like'.git') being left in the hinterland of the `entries` array.
The rearrangement in the entries array for our tests looks like this:
* ['.git', 'link'] -> ['link', 'link']
* ['link', '.git'] -> ['link', '.git']
In both cases, `entryCnt` is set to 1, meaning that the _valid_ portion of
the iterator is the same (ie ['link']), but that the portion after EOF,
which we reach by calling `fti.next(1)`, is _different_ depending on your
environment. The entry used by the iterator at that point will be either
'link' (if you're lucky) or '.git', which will blow up the test.
Note that somewhat ironically, the 'self-check' assertions don't catch
this bug, as 'path' data is only parsed _before_ EOF - so
`fti.getEntryPathString()` returns the string "link" (and the assertion
passes) regardless of whether you're about to read the '.git' entry or not.
Change-Id: Ie58a7bc76b740ee52881ebf555564a74379028d6
Signed-off-by: Roberto Tyley <roberto.tyley@gmail.com>
Just like we have launcher for other packages
Change-Id: I140b88b8fdcab08d6515cd1f0ba9a53a9701f60d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
It's strange that we have that member since it is not so clear
when it it set or not.
Change-Id: I53903a264f46866d249901a3cd9f9295028aa6bd
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
According to Win32 API, you need to specificy whether a symlink
points to a file or directory. These tests suggests a symlink created
for a file, can actually point to a directory. We can also create the
link before the target exists, so at least in this respect Windows
symbolic links appears to work as POSIX links.
On POSIX systems these tests have no relevance.
Change-Id: Id3991a4fc4333087c6f569acf04f503b0a0f170d