Since the introduction of generic type parameter inference in Java 7,
it's not necessary to explicitly specify the type of generic parameters.
Enable the warning in Eclipse, and fix all occurrences.
Change-Id: I9158caf1beca5e4980b6240ac401f3868520aad0
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Set missingOverrideAnnotation=warning in Eclipse compiler preferences
which enables the warning:
The method <method> of type <type> should be tagged with @Override
since it actually overrides a superclass method
Justification for this warning is described in:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/94411/381622
Enabling this causes in excess of 1000 warnings across the entire
code-base. They are very easy to fix automatically with Eclipse's
"Quick Fix" tool.
Fix all of them except 2 which cause compilation failure when the
project is built with mvn; add TODO comments on those for further
investigation.
Change-Id: I5772061041fd361fe93137fd8b0ad356e748a29c
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
MappedLoginService is no longer available in Jetty 9.4 therefore base
TestLoginService on AbstractLoginService.
Apparently Jetty now uses slf4j hence adapt RecordingLogger accordingly
so we can log error messages containing slf4j style formatting anchors
"{}".
Change-Id: Ibb36aba8782882936849b6102001a88b699bb65c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
9aa3748 added dummy implementations for loadRoleInfo() and
loadUserInfo() to class MappedLoginService to fix compile errors in
Eclipse when using 4.6 target platform which brings Jetty 9.3 adding
these two methods. Unfortunately this causes errors when using non 4.6
target platform coming with an older Jetty version. Fix this by
extracting the anonymous subclass of MappedLoginService which allows to
suppress the unused private method errors in Eclipse.
Change-Id: I75baeea7ff4502ce9ef2b541b3c0555da5535d79
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Eclipse Neon comes with Jetty 9.3 which is causing unimplemented
abstract method errors in test class AppServer when using the JGit or
EGit Neon target platform. Fix this by adding dummy implementations.
Change-Id: Ie49107d814a846997de95f149e91fe1ec2fbe4d8
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Implement LfsProtocolServlet handling the "Git LFS v1 Batch API"
protocol [1]. Add a simple file system based LFS content store and the
debug-lfs-store command to simplify testing.
Introduce a LargeFileRepository interface to enable additional storage
implementation while reusing the same protocol implementation.
At the client side we have to configure the lfs.url, specify that
we use the batch API and we don't use authentication:
[lfs]
url = http://host:port/lfs
batch = true
[lfs "http://host:port/lfs"]
access = none
the git-lfs client appends the "objects/batch" to the lfs.url.
Hard code an Authorization header in the FileLfsRepository.getAction
because then git-lfs client will skip asking for credentials. It will
just forward the Authorization header from the response to the
download/upload request.
The FileLfsServlet supports file content storage for "Large File
Storage" (LFS) server as defined by the Github LFS API [2].
- upload and download of large files is probably network bound hence use
an asynchronous servlet for good scalability
- simple object storage in file system with 2 level fan-out
- use LockFile to protect writing large objects against multiple
concurrent uploads of the same object
- to prevent corrupt uploads the uploaded file is rejected if its hash
doesn't match id given in URL
The debug-lfs-store command is used to run the LfsProtocolServlet and,
optionally, the FileLfsServlet which makes it easier to setup a
local test server.
[1]
https://github.com/github/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/http-v1-batch.md
[2] https://github.com/github/git-lfs/tree/master/docs/api
Bug: 472961
Change-Id: I7378da5575159d2195138d799704880c5c82d5f3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
Running tests using buck reveals that HttpClientTests are broken
and weren't executed by Maven since these test classes don't match the
maven-surefire-plugin's default for test classes **/*Test.java.
Will be fixed in a follow-up change.
Change-Id: I82a01b5fd3f0a930bec2423a29a256601dadc248
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
David Pursehouse
Matthias Sohn
David Pursehouse