Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I58ad45a87dcf7d646dce056d20776d62faafbfef
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I518b524de7cd3802f03b80450cad02ab3f79d57b
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: Ic89f9daef3c31bfbfd1f3c003cb90a373cd74847
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I463510342bb6e6b99b31a0fe264d953340784393
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The tests were set up to expect an IllegalArgumentException when
the Config.getInt method was called with a section.key that has
not been set, or explicitly set to an empty string.
However, the IllegalArgumentException never gets thrown because
the getInt method returns the provided default ("1"), and because
there was no call to "fail" after getInt, the incorrect behavior
of the test was not noticed.
Remove the try/catch around getInt, and instead assert that the
expected default value is returned.
Found by Error Prone, which reported:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: Ie8e692aba9fb8523241fb8f298d57493923d9f78
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Support the deepen-since parameter when requested by a client using
protocol v2. This is done by:
- adding a DepthWalk.RevWalk#setDeepenSince method
- updating DepthGenerator to recognize when deepen-since is set
- recording in DepthWalk.Commit whether a commit is a boundary commit
Existing users of DepthWalk such as UploadPack previously recognized
boundary commits by comparing their depths against the threshold, not
tracking whether any parents were truly excluded. This behavior is
preserved - UploadPack considers a commit as boundary if its depth is
equal to the threshold *or* a parent was excluded (whether by depth or
by deepen-since).
Change-Id: I852bba6b1279f9cc8aee38282e9339d62b8dcddc
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
The BufferedWriter is opened in a try-with-resource and thus will be
automatically closed.
Presumably the close was added to make sure it is closed before the
subsequent test statements are executed. Instead of explicitly closing
it, let the try-with-resource automatically close it, and move the
subsequent statements out of the try-block.
Change-Id: If5fada2f580ef9cbaad3a0b9216b5200b917781a
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Replace explicit construction of FileWriter with calls to the
utility method Files.newBufferedWriter, which allows to specify
the charset.
Also convert to try-with-resource.
Change-Id: I9fa3f612b9b2fc5ac12cd79d6e61ca181120dbf5
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Replace explicit construction of BufferedReader with calls to the
utility method Files.newBufferedReader, which allows to specify
the charset.
Change-Id: I61b9451dbc8d9cf83fc8a5981292b8fdc713ce37
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
As reported by Error Prone:
An inner class should be static unless it references members of its
enclosing class. An inner class that is made non-static unnecessarily
uses more memory and does not make the intent of the class clear.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ClassCanBeStatic
Change-Id: Ib99d120532630dba63cf400cc1c61c318286fc41
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
There should only be one statement after the expect(...) method.
Any additional statements after the statement that is expected to
throw will never be executed in a passing test. This can lead to
inappropriately passing tests where later incorrect assertions are
skipped by the thrown exception.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ExpectedExceptionChecker
Change-Id: I20fecf8fb7a243e9da097e6d03fbf8cd69151bf0
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
There should only be one statement after the expect(...) method.
Any additional statements after the statement that is expected to
throw will never be executed in a passing test. This can lead to
inappropriately passing tests where later incorrect assertions are
skipped by the thrown exception.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ExpectedExceptionChecker
Change-Id: I0d6350fafb281b6bdb04289f4cd5eb4bb159628b
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Support multiple prefixes when querying references to allow
implementor to minimize number of RPC calls.
Change-Id: I5f822fd7eaf9756b44750080d3056de138b64f4a
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
The commit message template contains a superfluous blank at the end of
the first line, which is deleted by this change. This is only relevant
for jgit contributors using Eclipse, not for jgit users.
Change-Id: I462deb49c26fb64b3dc2d1d75f1e40ef302b0fc9
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
Otherwise fetching all tags may pull in commits not on the
specified branches. Canonical git also does this.[1]
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/b160b6e69/builtin/clone.c#L1124
Bug: 538768
Change-Id: If0ac75fb9fae0c95d1a48b22954c54d4c3c09a47
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
When not all branches are cloned, the fetch refspec for the
remote should not be "+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*":
that would fetch all branches on the very next fetch, thus
making a clone with only a subset of the branches rather
pointless.
Instead, produce refspecs for the cloned branches only.
Canonical git also does this for its --single-branch case;
it doesn't have an option to clone only a subset of the branches
(only one or all).
Bug: 466858
Change-Id: Ie871880f757663437efac1e8b3313094f9e629b3
Also-by: Julian Enoch <julian.enoch@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Enoch <julian.enoch@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fetch code has been moved to a ProtocolV2Parser, but ls-refs code is
still in UploadPack.
Moving it to the parser makes it easier to test, keeps the parsing
together and makes the two commands follow similar structure.
Change-Id: I573ce543e804ddeb9f83303b4af250b7cddc8cad
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Also check that reflog is enabled by default.
Also check that a file in a folder is reset correctly.
Change-Id: I4bc6649928ce10d7b558901e465e8032b083ade0
Signed-off-by: René Scheibe <rene.scheibe@gmail.com>
The statement:
assertThat(recvStream.available(), is(0));
results in a warning from Eclipse:
The expression of type int is boxed into Integer
because recvStream.available() returns int, but the hamcrest is()
method takes an Integer.
Replace it with the equivalent JUnit assertion.
Also remove the suppression of another similar warning and fix that
in the same way.
Change-Id: I6f18b304a540bcd0a10aec7d3abc7dc6f047fe80
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
In order to support GPG-signed commits, add some methods which will
allow GPG signatures to be parsed out of RevCommit objects.
Later, we can add code to verify the signatures.
Change-Id: Ifcf6b3ac79115c15d3ec4b4eaed07315534d09ac
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Use existing test utility methods instead of nested PrintWriter usage.
Change-Id: I324852c7971ae644fa499f377a31d1cf265c7fd9
Signed-off-by: René Scheibe <rene.scheibe@gmail.com>