github/jgit - jgit - 帆软第三方插件仓库

4210 Commits

45 Branches

0 Tags

37 MiB

Tree: 398d8e877f

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Shawn Pearce	2f8d787b5f	buck: run tests Compile each test in its own java_test() target so they can run in parallel, reducing total time spent testing on large machines. $ buck test --all [-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0.3s [100%] [-] BUILDING...FINISHED 2.9s [100%] (351/383 JOBS, 351 UPDATED, 0.0% CACHE MISS) [-] TESTING...FINISHED 98.1s (3360 PASS/15 SKIP/0 FAIL) Change-Id: I8d6541268315089299f933ed23d785b1b3431133	9 years ago
David Ostrovsky	13502fef8f	Implement Buck driven build Today there are plenty of modern build tool systems available in the wild (in no particular order): * http://bazel.io * https://pantsbuild.github.io * http://shakebuild.com * https://ninja-build.org * https://buckbuild.com The attributes, that all these build tools have in common, are: * reliable * correct * very fast * reproducible It must not always be the other build tool, this project is currently using. Or, quoting Gerrit Code Review maintainer here: "Friends, don't let friends use <the other build tool system>!" This change is non-complete implementation of JGit build in Buck, needed by Gerrit Code Review to replace its dependency with standlone JGit cell. This is very useful when a developer is working on both projects and is trying to integrate changes made in JGit in Gerrit. The supported workflow is: $ cd jgit $ emacs <hack> $ cd ../gerrit $ buck build --config repositories.jgit=../jgit gerrit With --config repositories.jgit=../jgit jgit cell is routed through JGit development tree. To build jgit, issue: $ buck build //:jgit [-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0,0s Yes, you can't measure no-op build time, given that Buck daemon is used. Change-Id: I301a71b19fba35a5093d8cc64d4ba970c2877a44 Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>	9 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Shawn Pearce

2f8d787b5f

buck: run tests

Compile each test in its own java_test() target so they can run in
parallel, reducing total time spent testing on large machines.

$ buck test --all
[-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0.3s [100%]
[-] BUILDING...FINISHED 2.9s [100%] (351/383 JOBS, 351 UPDATED, 0.0% CACHE MISS)
[-] TESTING...FINISHED 98.1s (3360 PASS/15 SKIP/0 FAIL)

Change-Id: I8d6541268315089299f933ed23d785b1b3431133

9 years ago

David Ostrovsky

13502fef8f

Implement Buck driven build

Today there are plenty of modern build tool systems available in the
wild (in no particular order):

* http://bazel.io
* https://pantsbuild.github.io
* http://shakebuild.com
* https://ninja-build.org
* https://buckbuild.com

The attributes, that all these build tools have in common, are:

* reliable
* correct
* very fast
* reproducible

It must not always be the other build tool, this project is currently
using. Or, quoting Gerrit Code Review maintainer here:

  "Friends, don't let friends use <the other build tool system>!"

This change is non-complete implementation of JGit build in Buck,
needed by Gerrit Code Review to replace its dependency with standlone
JGit cell. This is very useful when a developer is working on both
projects and is trying to integrate changes made in JGit in Gerrit.

The supported workflow is:

  $ cd jgit
  $ emacs <hack>
  $ cd ../gerrit
  $ buck build --config repositories.jgit=../jgit gerrit

With --config repositories.jgit=../jgit jgit cell is routed through
JGit development tree.

To build jgit, issue:

  $ buck build //:jgit
  [-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0,0s

Yes, you can't measure no-op build time, given that Buck daemon is
used.

Change-Id: I301a71b19fba35a5093d8cc64d4ba970c2877a44
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>

9 years ago

2 Commits (398d8e877f91216e287a7a569ea758062dd7c521)