Older JGit stored only milliseconds timestamps in the index. Newer
JGit may get finer timestamps from the file system. This leads to
slow index diffs when a new JGit runs against an index produced
by older JGit because many timestamps will differ and JGit will
then do many content checks. See [1].
Handle this migration case by only comparing milliseconds if the
index entry has only millisecond precision.
The inverse may also occur; also compare only milliseconds if the
file timestamp has only millisecond precision.
Do the same also for microsecond resolution. On Windows, NTFS may
provide 100ns resolution and may be used by external programs writing
the index, but Java's WindowsFileAttributes may provide only
microseconds.
File timestamp precision in Java depends not only on the Java APIs
used by different JGit versions but may also change when running the
same Java code on different VMs. And of course the resolution may
vary among operating and file systems. Moreover, timestamp precision
in the index depends on the program that wrote the index. Canonical
git may use a different resolution, maybe even different between git
versions.
[1] https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/1100344/
Change-Id: Idfd08606c883cb98787b2138f9baf0cc89a57b56
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Using buildifier from master branch and the command:
$ buildifier -r -lint fix -warnings all .
Change-Id: I19c8ff183081093cb73bed7221a78a91b6cba4dc
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Using buildifier from master branch and the command:
$ buildifier -r -lint fix -warnings all .
Change-Id: I52a18c09a1f192e2141f4156f9c1aabbbdbc910a
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
FileTreeIteratorWithTimeControl was deleted in a024759, but was
not removed from the BUILD file, thus causing the bazel build to
fail.
Change-Id: I892c0ffcac947298d0d6009374ee2c5d9afefb66
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e54fde8616)
PackedBatchRefUpdate was creating a new packed-refs list that was
potentially unsorted. This would be papered over when the list was
read back from disk in parsePackedRef, which detects unsorted ref
lists on reading, and sorts them. However, the BatchRefUpdate also
installed the new (unsorted) list in-memory in
RefDirectory#packedRefs.
With the timestamp granularity code committed to stable-5.1, we can
more often accurately decide that the packed-refs file is clean, and
will return the erroneous unsorted data more often. Unluckily timed
delays also cause the file to be clean, hence this problem was
exacerbated under load.
The symptom is that refs added by a BatchRefUpdate would stop being
visible directly after they were added. In particular, the Gerrit
integration tests uses BatchRefUpdate in its setup for creating the
Admin group, and then tries to read it out directly afterward.
The tests recreates one failure case. A better approach would be to
revise RefList.Builder, so it detects out-of-order lists and
automatically sorts them.
Fixes https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=548716 and
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=11373.
Bug: 548716
Change-Id: I613c8059964513ce2370543620725b540b3cb6d1
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The only usage of this test iterator was removed in df637928d. Hence
delete this iterator and associated test.
Change-Id: I47710133ec3edc675c21db210960c024982668c6
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
(cherry picked from commit a024759cf5)
This test case assumed file system timestamp resolution of 1 second. On
filesystems with a finer resolution this test fails since the index
entry is only smudged if the file index entry's lastModified and the
lastModified of the git index itself are within the same filesystem
timer tick. Fix this by ensuring that these timestamps are identical
which should work for any filesystem timer resolution.
Bug: 548188
Change-Id: Id84d59e1cfeb48fa008f8f27f2f892c4f73985de
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1159f9dd7c)
By using File#setLastModified, we can create a racy git situation
stably.
Tested with --runs_per_test=100
Bug: 526111
Change-Id: I60b3632d353e19f335668325aa603640be423f58
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit df637928d2)
Add the constant, and implement hashing of known host names in
OpenSshServerKeyDatabase. Add a test verifying that the hashing
works.
Bug: 548492
Change-Id: Iabe82b666da627bd7f4d82519a366d166aa9ddd4
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Move the handling of cached user and system config to getSystemConfig
and getUserConfig methods and revert the implementation of
openSystemConfig and openUserConfig to the old stateless
implementation.
This ensures the open methods respect the passed-in parent config, which
may be different on each invocation. Additionally, returning a new
instance matches the behavior of the previous implementation of the
default system reader, which downstream callers may be depending on.
Move the implementation of the new caching methods getSystemConfig and
getUserConfig up to SystemReader. This avoids that we break the ABI for
subclasses of SystemReader.
Also see [1] which fixed a similar problem with Gerrit's custom
SystemReader.
[1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/225458
Change-Id: If54a2491932d8fc914d4649cb73c9e837c5b8ad0
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When firstParent is set, RevWalk traverses only the first parent of a
commit, even though that commit is UNINTERESTING. Since we want the
maximal UNINTERESTING set, we shouldn't prune any parents here. This
issue is apparent only when some of the commits being traversed are
unparsed, since walker.carryFlagsImpl() propagates the UNINTERESTING
flag to all parsed ancestors, masking the issue.
Therefore teach RevWalk to traverse all parents when a commit is
UNINTERESTING and not only the first parent. Since this issue is
masked by commit parsing, also test situations when the commits
involved are unparsed.
Signed-off-by: Alex Spradlin <alexaspradlin@google.com>
Change-Id: I95e2ad9ae8f1f50fbecae674367ee7e0855519b1
Bazel uses a security manager to sandbox tests, it cannot handle another
security manager.
Change-Id: Id7dd11073178e5e65337414681c1c6e74e14cba7
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
It's expected that jgit should work without native git installation.
In such case Security Manager can be configured to deny access to the
files outside of git repository. JGit tries to find cygwin
installation. If Security manager restricts access to some folders
in PATH, it should be considered that those folders are absent
for jgit.
Also JGit tries to detect if symbolic links are supported by OS. If
security manager forbids creation of symlinks, it should be assumed
that symlinks aren't supported.
Bug: 550115
Change-Id: Ic4b243cada604bc1090db6cc1cfd74f0fa324b98
Signed-off-by: Nail Samatov <sanail@yandex.ru>
Teach UploadPack to take a provider of URIs corresponding to cached
packs. When fetching, if the client supports the packfile-uri feature,
and if such a cached pack were to be streamed, instead send the
corresponding URI.
This packfile-uri feature is implemented in the jt/fetch-cdn-offload
branch of Git. There is interest in this feature [1], but it is not yet
merged.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/cover.1552073690.git.jonathantanmy@google.com/
Change-Id: I9a32dae131c9c56ad2ff4a8a9638ae3b5e44dc15
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Previously, the API did not enforce ordering of writes. Misuse of
this API would lead to data effectively being lost.
Guard against that with IllegalArgumentException, and add a test.
Change-Id: I04f55c481d60532fc64d35fa32c47037a03988ae
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Small reftables omit the log index. Currently,
ReftableWriter#shouldHaveIndex does this if there is a single-block
log, but other writers could decide on different criteria.
In the case that the log index is missing, we have to linearly search
for the right block. It is never appropriate to use binary search on
blocks for log data, as the blocks are compressed and therefore
irregularly sized.
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Change-Id: Id59874edf6bf45c7dec502d9465888e077ffe198