All existing instances of this issue have been fixed in preceding
commits. Increase its severity to ERROR so that it is easier to
detect reoccurences.
Change-Id: I50f95152857baac5ca44c15493f23b6f9cfac1bf
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
All instances of this potential bug have been cleaned up in
preceding commits. Increase the severity to ERROR so that it
is easier to detect reoccurences.
Change-Id: I25beebcea1f01f468e0f2b1d24a83511029c077c
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Incorrect usage of ExpectedException has been cleaned up in the
preceding commits. Increase the severity from WARN to ERROR so
that it is easier to catch any reoccurences.
Change-Id: I57decf620b37e85413bda53723f839c02b488f2c
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
On recent bazel versions it's trivial to apply package specific checks.
Provide custom java toolchain with all error prone warnings activated.
The list of all error prone warnings was borrowed from here: [1].
Test Plan:
$ bazel build --java_toolchain //tools:error_prone_warnings_toolchain \
//...
[1] https://github.com/bazelbuild/BUILD_file_generator/blob/master/tools/bazel_defs/java.bzl
Change-Id: I207a368555bfb7ddab8d782d46d563ce779a6211
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The initial implementation only builds the packages consumed by
Gerrit Code Review.
Test build and execution is not implemented.
We prefer to consume maven_jar custom rule from bazlets repository,
for the same reasons as in the Gerrit project:
* Caching artifacts across different clones and projects
* Exposing source classifiers and neverlink artifact
TEST PLAN:
$ bazel build :all
$ unzip -t bazel-genfiles/all.zip
Archive: bazel-genfiles/all.zip
testing: libjgit-archive.jar OK
testing: libjgit-servlet.jar OK
testing: libjgit.jar OK
testing: libjunit.jar OK
No errors detected in compressed data of bazel-genfiles/all.zip.
Change-Id: Ia837ce95d9829fe2515f37b7a04a71a4598672a0
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The bundle org.eclipse.jgit.java7 was deleted in 4.0
Change-Id: I57dbc0b18eaf164c8f53cc2b776ecb80481a993d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
We don't need to update versions for this project which was removed
a long time ago.
Change-Id: Ie2d030134942add152847581797db3a213ec4c9e
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Run git describe during the build to determine the lineage of this
working directory and stamp this information into the binary.
Change-Id: I0ad24125c31e4280ccf900bac4065924087b05aa
Today there are plenty of modern build tool systems available in the
wild (in no particular order):
* http://bazel.io
* https://pantsbuild.github.io
* http://shakebuild.com
* https://ninja-build.org
* https://buckbuild.com
The attributes, that all these build tools have in common, are:
* reliable
* correct
* very fast
* reproducible
It must not always be the other build tool, this project is currently
using. Or, quoting Gerrit Code Review maintainer here:
"Friends, don't let friends use <the other build tool system>!"
This change is non-complete implementation of JGit build in Buck,
needed by Gerrit Code Review to replace its dependency with standlone
JGit cell. This is very useful when a developer is working on both
projects and is trying to integrate changes made in JGit in Gerrit.
The supported workflow is:
$ cd jgit
$ emacs <hack>
$ cd ../gerrit
$ buck build --config repositories.jgit=../jgit gerrit
With --config repositories.jgit=../jgit jgit cell is routed through
JGit development tree.
To build jgit, issue:
$ buck build //:jgit
[-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0,0s
Yes, you can't measure no-op build time, given that Buck daemon is
used.
Change-Id: I301a71b19fba35a5093d8cc64d4ba970c2877a44
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Since we updated minimum Java version to Java 7 the console bundle
doesn't need to be a separate bundle anymore. Move the contained classes
to the pgm bundle which is using these classes.
Change-Id: If8e6f2d7405fdfe6f4b178673b4ccf99c67d4b64
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Also check if the passed version matches the version pattern
<major>.<minor>.<micro>.<qualifier>-<classifier>
Change-Id: Ib7edf51fb5e89232909611de5b4811a62b4f3953
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The version attribute of Eclipse-SourceBundle must match
the bundle version.
Change-Id: Ic629ccae1d89c9070e4ec80420a0e2ed7d403922
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
These scripts were created to bootstrap the initial contribution for
Eclipse using information from the pre-Eclipse history. We are well
past the point where the project will rewrite history in order to
correct copyright statements, so these tools no longer make sense
to keep in the tip of the tree.
Change-Id: If68419ead0766035d17a21a53a3e5e761eaa70c4
The 1.0.0 release tags have a new suffix.
Account for this.
Change-Id: Ic6f260b6a5ba353af3b312b722f576155208eaa0
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We used our LICENSE file to describe both the license of the package,
and also the header template that should appear at the start of
all Java files we create. This creates a confusing situation for
readers who just want to consume the package, because our file
header template starts off in the middle of a sentence.
Move our template header to a separate file, and reformat the text
of the license to be something more readable by a person reviewing
the project's terms of use.
Change-Id: If318e64c06683ea14e0240914c2d057c9199ce98
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Windows doesn't permit us to edit a file in-place with Perl.
So create backup files when we perform the edit, and remove them
when we are done. This is a tad slower on POSIX systems, but is
much more portable.
Change-Id: I429c7d698924cb32e709363f5da82f7232bbdab2
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Tag the version number and API range in the OSGi manifest files
whenever we bump the pom.xml files.
Change-Id: I7c38b51f7139c02bef6b0e67d3f9199cbcdc8a39
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The script merges explicit copyright statements in all Java
sources with author information from git history, updates the
copyright headers accordingly, and updates the license headers
to EDL. For recognized copyright formats see the test data in
tools/fix-headers.tst.
To fix headers only in the current working directory:
./tools/fix-headers.pl
To fix the headers for all revisions (don't do this if you don't
understand the implications of rewriting history) run:
./tools/rewrite-history.sh
Authors are mapped to employer copyright statements through a
hardcoded table in the top of the script. This is a crude but
simple way to list date ranges under which certain changes need
to be attributed to copyright holders other than the author.
Change-Id: I654d758658cded02d91324c385f336bcc57fd85f
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Tycho isn't production ready for projects like JGit to be using as
their primary build driver. Some problems we ran into with Tycho
0.6.0 that are preventing us from using it are:
* Tycho can't run offline
The P2 artifact resolver cannot perform its work offline. If the
build system has no network connection, it cannot compile a
project through Tycho. This is insane for a distributed version
control system where developers are used to being offline during
development and local testing.
* Magic state in ~/.m2/repository/.meta/p2-metadata.properties
Earlier iterations of this patch tried to use a hybrid build,
where Tycho was only used for the Eclipse specific feature and P2
update site, and maven-bundle-plugin was used for the other code.
This build seemed to work, but only due to magic Tycho specific
state held in my local home directory. This means builds are not
consistently repeatable across systems, and lead me to believe
I had a valid build, when in fact I did not.
* Manifest-first build produces incomplete POMs
The POM created by the manifest-first build format does not
contain the dependency chain, leading a downstream consumer to
not import the runtime dependencies necessary to execute the
bundle it has imported. In JGit's case, this means JSch isn't
included in our dependency chain.
* Manifest-first build produces POMs unreadable by Maven 2.x
JGit has existing application consumers who are relying on
Maven 2.x builds. Forcing them to step up to an alpha release
of Maven 3 is simply unacceptable.
* OSGi bundle export data management is tedious
Editing each of our pom.xml files to mark a new release is
difficult enough as it is. Editing every MANIFEST.MF file to
list our exported packages and their current version number is
something a machine should do, not a human. Yet the Tycho OSGi
way unfortunately demands that a human do this work.
* OSGi bundle import data management is tedious
There isn't a way in the MANIFEST.MF file format to reuse the
same version tags across all of our imports, but we want to have
a consistent view of our dependencies when we compile JGit.
After wasting more than 2 full days trying to get Tycho to work,
I've decided its a lost cause right now. We need to be chasing down
bugs and critical features, not trying to bridge the gap between
the stable Maven repository format and the undocumented P2 format
used only by Eclipse.
So, switch the build to use Apache Felix's maven-bundle-plugin.
This is the same plugin Jetty uses to produce their OSGi bundle
manifests, and is the same plugin used by the Apache Felix project,
which is an open-source OSGi runtime. It has a reasonable number
of folks using it for production builds, and is running on top of
the stable Maven 2.x code base.
With this switch we get automatically generated MANIFEST.MF files
based on reasonably sane default rules, which reduces the amount
of things we have to maintain by hand. When necessary, we can add
a few lines of XML to our POMs to tweak the output.
Our build artifacts are still fully compatible with Maven 2.x, so
any downstream consumers are still able to use our build products,
without stepping up to Maven 3.x. Our artifacts are also valid as
OSGi bundles, provided they are organized on disk into a repository
that the runtime can read.
With maven-bundle-plugin the build runs offline, as much as Maven
2.x is able to run offline anyway, so we're able to return to a
distributed development environment again.
By generating MANIFEST.MF at the top level of each project (and
therefore outside of the target directory), we're still compatible
with Eclipse's PDE tooling. Our projects can be imported as standard
Maven projects using the m2eclipse plugin, but the PDE will think
they are vaild plugins and make them available for plugin builds,
or while debugging another workbench.
This change also completely removes Tycho from the build.
Unfortunately, Tycho 0.6.0's pom-first dependency resolver is broken
when resolving a pom-first plugin bundle through a manifest-first
feature package, so bundle org.eclipse.jgit can't be resolved,
even though it might actually exist in the local Maven repository.
Rather than fight with Tycho any further, I'm just declaring it
plugina-non-grata and ripping it out of the build.
Since there are very few tools to build a P2 format repository, and
no documentation on how to create one without running the Eclipse
UI manually by poking buttons, I'm declaring that we are not going
to produce a P2 update site from our automated builds.
Change-Id: If7938a86fb0cc8e25099028d832dbd38110b9124
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We can now use `tools/version.sh --release` to update the MANIFEST.MF
and Maven POM files with the current version number of this project,
so they appear in any build product created.
The counterpart --snapshot option be used to reset files to use
their natural *-SNAPSHOT and *.qualifier state during development.
We use a simple Bourne shell script with Perl calls because we
must edit both Maven pom.xml and OSGi bundle MANIFEST.MF in order
to store the correct data for our parallel build systems. In the
future we should use a native Java solution which relies upon JGit
to compute the `git describe` portion.
Until we tag our first official release a "tagged snapshot" can be
made by creating an artifical annotated tag first:
git tag -a -m "initial contribution" v0.5.1 046198cf5f21e5a63e8ec0ecde2ef3fe21db2eae
tools/version.sh --release
Resulting in a version string like "0.5.1.50-ge16af83".
Change-Id: Ic2bbae75bf96fc8831324c62c2212131277f70e4
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We now supply an exported format description for anyone to import
into their own workbench, and all projects reference this style in
a consistent way.
Change-Id: Ic243544a761ef2db29025a89ba6bb932a3a3ce34
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This script can be executed by a developer to download and graft
on the old JGit history, from before we moved the project to the
eclipse.org namespace and the Eclipse Foundation servers.
Executing this script is only necessary if you need to run log or
blame past the migration boundary, and isn't always recommended when
it comes to pushing objects to a remote server. As mentioned in the
script, it is best to use a specialized repository with this graft,
not your main work repository.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
David Pursehouse
David Ostrovsky
Matthias Sohn
Shawn Pearce
Shawn Pearce