From fccbcc8d7df592cc591568f6e7b328abdbce7602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rubik <39549317+wenhemin@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:13:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fix: The constructor has passed in an taskAppId, no need to
 get from taskAppId. (#1906)

---
 .../server/worker/task/AbstractCommandExecutor.java            | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dolphinscheduler-server/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/server/worker/task/AbstractCommandExecutor.java b/dolphinscheduler-server/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/server/worker/task/AbstractCommandExecutor.java
index 0c62f0648a..04098215dd 100644
--- a/dolphinscheduler-server/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/server/worker/task/AbstractCommandExecutor.java
+++ b/dolphinscheduler-server/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/server/worker/task/AbstractCommandExecutor.java
@@ -147,9 +147,6 @@ public abstract class AbstractCommandExecutor {
             // get process id
             int pid = getProcessId(process);
 
-            // task instance id
-            int taskInstId = Integer.parseInt(taskAppId.split("_")[2]);
-
             processDao.updatePidByTaskInstId(taskInstId, pid, "");
 
             logger.info("process start, process id is: {}", pid);